Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23372662›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2013

State of affairs of tuberculosis in prison facilities: a systematic review of screening practices and recommendations for best TB control.

Natalie V S Vinkeles Melchers, Sabine L van Elsland, Joep M A Lange, Martien W Borgdorff, Jan van den Hombergh

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effectiveness of interventions for reducing TB incidence in countries with low TB incidence: a systematic review of reviews.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Tuberculosis in Prisons: Importance of Considering the Clustering in the Analysis of Cross-Sectional Studies.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Correctional Officers' Health Literacy and Practices for Pulmonary Tuberculosis Prevention in Prison.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Yield, Efficiency, and Costs of Mass Screening Algorithms for Tuberculosis in Brazilian Prisons.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2021
    Article
  13. Guards in Prisons: A Risk Group for Latent Tuberculosis Infection.Journal of immigrant and minority health · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Tuberculosis in the Prisons in the Republic of Macedonia, 2008-2017.Open access Macedonian journal of medical sciences · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Natalie V S Vinkeles MelchersAcademic Medical Center, Department of Global Health, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. natalie.melchers@gmail.com
Sabine L van Elsland
Joep M A Lange
Martien W Borgdorff
Jan van den Hombergh
Academic Medical Center · NLAmsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development · NLAmsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NLGGD Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrisoners are at high risk of developing tuberculosis (TB), causing morbidity and mortality. Prison facilities encounter many challenges in TB screening procedures and TB control. This review explores screening practices for detection of TB and describes limitations of TB control in prison facilities worldwide.

methodsA systematic search of online databases (e.g., PubMed and Embase) and conference abstracts was carried out. Research papers describing screening and diagnostic practices among prisoners were included. A total of 52 articles met the inclusion criteria. A meta-analysis of TB prevalence in prison facilities by screening and diagnostic tools was performed.

resultsThe most common screening tool was symptom questionnaires (63·5%), mostly reporting presence of cough. Microscopy of sputum with Ziehl-Neelsen staining and solid culture were the most frequently combined diagnostic methods (21·2%). Chest X-ray and tuberculin skin tests were used by 73·1% and 50%, respectively, as either a screening and/or diagnostic tool. Median TB prevalence among prisoners of all included studies was 1,913 cases of TB per 100,000 prisoners (interquartile range [IQR]: 332-3,517). The overall annual median TB incidence was 7·0 cases per 1000 person-years (IQR: 2·7-30·0). Major limitations for successful TB control were inaccuracy of diagnostic algorithms and the lack of adequate laboratory facilities reported by 61·5% of studies. The most frequent recommendation for improving TB control and case detection was to increase screening frequency (73·1%). DISCUSSION: TB screening algorithms differ by income area and should be adapted to local contexts. In order to control TB, prison facilities must improve laboratory capacity and frequent use of effective screening and diagnostic tools. Sustainable political will and funding are critical to achieve this.

Indexed as

CoughDatabases, BibliographicFemaleHumansIncidenceLaboratory Proficiency TestingMaleMycobacterium tuberculosisPrevalencePrisonersPrisonsRadiography, ThoracicSputumSurveys and QuestionnairesTuberculin TestTuberculosis, Pulmonary

Identifiers

PMID23372662
PMCPMC3556085
OpenAlexW1995336946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.