Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23372270›Full record

Trial reportSleep2013

Flexible positive airway pressure improves treatment adherence compared with auto-adjusting PAP.

Yuichi Chihara, Tomomasa Tsuboi, Takefumi Hitomi, Masanori Azuma, Kimihiko Murase, Yoshiro Toyama, Yuka Harada, Kensaku Aihara, Kiminobu Tanizawa, Tomohiro Handa and 5 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Sleep, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00873977 (Comparison of Three Modalities of Continuous Positive Pressure Airway Treatment for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00873977 nacompletednot on this map

Comparison of Three Modalities of Continuous Positive Pressure Airway Treatment for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome

TypeinterventionalSponsorKyoto University, Graduate School of MedicineRan2009 to 2011Enrolled93ConditionsObstructive Sleep ApneaArmsCPAP (REMstar (Respironics))
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Treatment of Adult Obstructive Sleep Apnea With Positive Airway Pressure: An American Academy of Sleep Medicine Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and GRADE Assessment.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. APAP, BPAP, CPAP, and New Modes of Positive Airway Pressure Therapy.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022
    Review
  11. Pressure-Relief Features of Fixed and Autotitrating Continuous Positive Airway Pressure May Impair Their Efficacy: Evaluation with a Respiratory Bench Model.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2016
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Yuichi ChiharaDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Tomomasa Tsuboi
Takefumi Hitomi
Masanori Azuma
Kimihiko Murase
Yoshiro Toyama
Yuka Harada
Kensaku Aihara
Kiminobu Tanizawa
Tomohiro Handa
Chikara Yoshimura
Toru Oga
Kazuhiko Yamamoto
Michiaki Mishima
Kazuo Chin

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

objectivesThere are no clinical data comparing adherence and quality of life between auto-adjusting positive airway pressure (APAP) and two different flex positive airway pressure (PAP) devices (A-Flex, C-Flex) in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). DESIGN AND

settingNinety-three patients in whom OSA was newly diagnosed were randomly assigned to receive 3 mo of APAP (n = 31), APAP with C-Flex (n = 31), or APAP with A-Flex (n = 31). Objective adherence was determined after 3 mo of CPAP treatment, and the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), and Calgary Sleep Apnea Quality of Life Index (SAQLI) were examined at baseline and after 3 mo. After 3 mo, patients in the APAP with A-Flex group and those in the APAP with C-Flex group were crossed over and those in the APAP group were switched to A-Flex for an additional 3 mo. MEASUREMENTS AND

resultsThe groups were similar demographically. Treatment adherence during the first 3 mo was significantly greater in the APAP with C-Flex group (APAP with C-Flex: 5.19 ± 1.84 h/night versus APAP: 3.96 ± 1.66 h/night versus APAP with A-Flex: 4.27 ± 2.12 h/night, P = 0.04). There was a significant improvement in two of four of the SAQLI domain scores and in the ESS and PSQI in the APAP with C-Flex group. Adherence significantly improved among the poor compliers (< 4 h/night of use) in the APAP group after change to APAP with A-Flex (P = 0.01).

conclusionsOf these three modes of PAP delivery, adherence was greatest with APAP with C-Flex. CLINICAL

trial registrationURL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00873977.

Indexed as

Patient ComplianceContinuous Positive Airway PressureCross-Over StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPolysomnographySingle-Blind MethodSleep Apnea, Obstructive

Identifiers

PMID23372270
PMCPMC3543062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.