Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23372134›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Dental Association (1939)2013

Rubber dam use during root canal treatment: findings from The Dental Practice-Based Research Network.

Mona F Anabtawi, Gregg H Gilbert, Michael R Bauer, Gregg Reams, Sonia K Makhija, Paul L Benjamin, O Dale Williams, National Dental Practice-Based Research Network Collaborative Group

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Dental Association (1939), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB · 2023
    Article
  7. Online Questionnaire-Based Study to Evaluate the Attitudes and Use of Rubber Dental Dams by Saudi Dental Practitioners.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Accidental ingestion of an endodontic file: a case report.Journal of medical case reports · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Aspects of Clinical Malpractice in Endodontics.European journal of dentistry · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Mona F AnabtawiDepartment of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA.
Gregg H Gilbert
Michael R Bauer
Gregg Reams
Sonia K Makhija
Paul L Benjamin
O Dale Williams
National Dental Practice-Based Research Network Collaborative Group
University of Alabama at Birmingham · USFlorida International University · USAmerican Association of Endodontists · USHealthPartners · US

Funding

The National Dental PBRNU19DE022516 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI GILBERT, GREGG H · 2012 to 2018
$66.4M
Dental PBRN Network ChairU01DE016747 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI GILBERT, GREGG H · 2005 to 2011
$17.3M
Dental Practice-Based Research Network Coordinating CtrU01DE016746 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI FUNKHOUSER, ELLEN M · 2005 to 2011
$7.0M
NIDCR NIH HHS U01 DE016746NIDCR NIH HHS U01 DE016747NIDCR NIH HHS U01-DE-16746NIDCR NIH HHS U01-DE-16747NIDCR NIH HHS U19 DE022516NIDCR NIH HHS U19-DE-22516
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Dental Practice-Based Research Network (DPBRN) provided a means to investigate whether certain procedures were performed routinely. The authors conducted a study to quantify rubber dam use during root canal treatment (RCT) among general dentists and to test the hypothesis that certain dentist or practice characteristics were associated with rubber dam use.

methodsDPBRN practitioner-investigators (P-Is) answered a questionnaire that included items about rubber dam use and other forms of isolation during RCT. DPBRN enrollment questionnaire data provided information regarding practitioner and practice characteristics.

resultsA total of 729 (74 percent) of 991 P-Is responded; 524 were general dentists who reported providing at least some RCTs and reported the percentage of RCTs for which they used a rubber dam. Of these 524 P-Is, 44 percent used a rubber dam for all RCTs, 24 percent used it for 51 to 99 percent of RCTs, 17 percent used it for 1 to 50 percent of RCTs, and 15 percent never used it during RCT. Usage varied significantly by geographic region and practice type. The use of cotton rolls and other forms of isolation also was reported.

conclusionsSimilar to other reports in the literature, not all DPBRN general dentists used a rubber dam during RCT. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Because the clinical reference standard is to use a rubber dam during RCT, increasing its use may be important.

Indexed as

Community-Based Participatory ResearchCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGeneral Practice, DentalGroup PracticeHispanic or LatinoHumansMaleManaged Care ProgramsPrivate PracticeProfessional Practice LocationPublic Health DentistryRoot Canal TherapyRubber DamsScandinavian and Nordic CountriesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID23372134
PMCPMC3563093
OpenAlexW1933194016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.