Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23371481›Full record

ReviewCurrent rheumatology reports2013

Psoriatic arthritis: phenotypic variance and nosology.

Lihi Eder, Dafna D Gladman

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current rheumatology reports, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Psoriatic arthritis.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2021
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors in psoriatic arthritis.Expert review of clinical pharmacology · 2017
    Review
  18. Review
  19. The Epidemiology of Psoriatic Arthritis.Rheumatic diseases clinics of North America · 2015
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lihi EderCentre for Prognosis Studies in the Rheumatic Diseases, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Dafna D Gladman
Toronto Western Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) has been recognized as a distinct entity different from rheumatoid arthritis. Classification and phenotyping of PsA have progressed substantially since the first classification criteria of the disease were published in 1973 by Moll and Wright. The initial disease patterns described by Moll and Wright have been found to overlap and change over time. There has been controversy about whether these should be maintained or whether the phenotype of PsA should include peripheral and axial disease only. PsA is a multifaceted disease that can present as different clinical phenotypes: peripheral arthritis, axial disease, skin and nail disease, dactylitis, and enthesitis. Development of the high-sensitivity and high-specificity CASPAR criteria was the first step to conducting high-quality trials and observational studies in the field.

Indexed as

Arthritis, PsoriaticArthritis, ReactiveHumansPhenotypeSpondylitis, Ankylosing

Identifiers

PMID23371481
OpenAlexW2004262575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.