Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23371467›Full record

ArticleCurrent osteoporosis reports2013

The potential benefits and inherent risks of vibration as a non-drug therapy for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis.

M Ete Chan, Gunes Uzer, Clinton T Rubin

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current osteoporosis reports, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Effect of Low-Magnitude Mechanical Stimuli on Bone Density and Structure in Pediatric Crohn's Disease: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2016
    Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Whole Body Vibration Therapy for Children with Disabilities: A Survey of Potential Risks and Benefits.Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Effectiveness and importance of powered tooth brushes in tooth movement.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M Ete ChanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA, meilin.chan@stonybrook.edu.
Gunes Uzer
Clinton T Rubin
Stony Brook University · US

Funding

AUGMENTATION OF TRABECULAR BONE BY LOW MAGNITUDE STRAINR01AR043498 · NIAMS · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI RUBIN, CLINTON T · 1997 to 2012
$2.8M
Harnessing mechanical signals to control mesenchymal stem cell fateR01EB014351 · NIBIB · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI JUDEX, STEFAN, RUBIN, CLINTON T · 2012 to 2014
$1.0M
ATTENUATION OF WOLFFS LAW BY SYSTEMIC DISORDERSR01AR039278 · NIAMS · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI RUBIN, CLINTON T · 1991 to 1995
–
ATTENUATION OF WOLFF'S LAW BY SYSTEMIC DISORDERSR29AR039278 · NIAMS · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI RUBIN, CLINTON T · 1987 to 1989
–
NIAMS NIH HHS AR-39278NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR043498NIBIB NIH HHS EB-14351NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB014351
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The delivery of mechanical signals to the skeleton using vibration is being considered as a non-drug treatment of osteoporosis. Delivered over a range of magnitudes and frequencies, vibration has been shown to be both anabolic and anti-catabolic to the musculoskeletal tissues, yet caution must be emphasized as these mechanical signals, particularly chronic exposure to higher intensities, is a known pathogen to many physiological systems. In contrast, accumulating preclinical and clinical evidence indicates that low intensity vibration (LIV) improves bone quality through regulating the activity of cells responsible for bone remodeling, as well as biasing the differentiation fate of their mesenchymal and hematopoietic stem cell progenitors. In vitro studies provide insights into the biologic mechanisms of LIV, and indicate that cells respond to these low magnitude signals through a distinct mechanism driven not by matrix strain but acceleration. These cell, animal, and human studies may represent the foundation of a safe, non-drug means to protect and improve the musculoskeletal system of the elderly, injured, and infirmed.

Indexed as

AnimalsBone and BonesBone RemodelingDisease Models, AnimalHumansMechanotransduction, CellularMiceOsteoporosisRisk AssessmentVibration

Identifiers

PMID23371467
PMCPMC3586310
OpenAlexW2061454066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.