Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23370990›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2014

No difference in accuracy between pinless and conventional computer-assisted surgery in total knee arthroplasty.

C Baier, G Maderbacher, H R Springorum, F Zeman, W Fitz, J Schaumburger, J Grifka, J Beckmann

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Surgical accuracy in high tibial osteotomy: coronal equivalence of computer navigation and gap measurement.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2016
    Trial
  2. Radiological outcomes of pinless navigation in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2015
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. What is the optimal valgus pre-set for intramedullary femoral alignment rods in total knee arthroplasty?Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2017
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Appropriate sagittal femoral component alignment cannot be ensured by intramedullary alignment rods.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2016
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

C BaierOrthopaedic Department, University of Regensburg, Kaiser-Karl V.-Allee 3, 93077, Bad Abbach, Germany, dr.clemensbaier@gmail.com.
G Maderbacher
H R Springorum
F Zeman
W Fitz
J Schaumburger
J Grifka
J Beckmann

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMany studies have demonstrated higher precision and better radiological results in Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with computer-assisted surgery (CAS). On the other hand, studies revealed a lengthening of operation time up to 20 min for this technique and demonstrated rare additional complications as fractures and neurovascular injuries caused by the array pins and any intraoperative array dislocation leads to abortion of CAS. To combine the advantages and eliminate the disadvantages of standard CAS, we evaluated the accuracy of a so-called pinless CT-free version of knee navigation (pinless CAS) abandoning the reference pins and reducing the necessary workflow to a minimum.

methodThe present study compares the accuracy of the reference methods of two different CT-free knee navigation software versions (Brainlab Knee 2.1 and Brainlab Knee Express 2.5). Thirty patients received TKA assisted by standard CAS. Intraoperatively, the proposed bony resections of standard CAS were matched with the new pinless CAS. Postoperatively, the results were checked by evaluating the radiographs concerning leg axis, femoral flexion and tibial slope.

resultsAll results concerning precise cuts (femoral as well as tibial coronal/varus-valgus alignment, femoral flexion alignment and tibial slope, resection height) were comparable between both groups (n.s.). In femoral, we found a mean deviation of coronal alignment of 0.3° (SD 0.7) and flexion of 0.2° (SD 0.8). In tibial, we found a mean deviation of coronal alignment of 0.2° (SD 0.5) and slope of 0.2° (SD 0.6). The mean additional operation time for the pinless CAS was below 2 min. The postoperative mechanical leg axis was within the threshold of 3° in all patients, tibial slope and femoral flexion matched with CAS values.

conclusionIn clinical routine, pinless CAS can comprise the advantages of CAS leaving the disadvantages aside. It reduces surgical time and avoids complications associated with the tracking pins of conventional CAS.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeSurgery, Computer-AssistedAgedAged, 80 and overBone NailsFemaleFemurHumansKnee JointMaleMiddle AgedRange of Motion, ArticularSoftwareTibia

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.