Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23370826›Full record

ArticleIntensive care medicine2013

A universal definition of ARDS: the PaO2/FiO2 ratio under a standard ventilatory setting--a prospective, multicenter validation study.

Jesús Villar, Lina Pérez-Méndez, Jesús Blanco, José Manuel Añón, Lluís Blanch, Javier Belda, Antonio Santos-Bouza, Rosa Lidia Fernández, Robert M Kacmarek, Spanish Initiative for Epidemiology, Stratification, and Therapies for ARDS (SIESTA) Network

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive care medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 106 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
106citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
14.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

106 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 203 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Predictive Value of the PaOInternal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Beyond the PaOAnnals of intensive care · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Exploring pharmacological strategies in the management of ARDS: Efficacy, limitations, and future directions.Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2025
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Association ofHeliyon · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

46 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Jesús VillarCIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain. jesus.villar54@gmail.com
Lina Pérez-Méndez
Jesús Blanco
José Manuel Añón
Lluís Blanch
Javier Belda
Antonio Santos-Bouza
Rosa Lidia Fernández
Robert M Kacmarek
Spanish Initiative for Epidemiology, Stratification, and Therapies for ARDS (SIESTA) Network
Instituto de Salud Carlos III · ESComplejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago · ESCorporació Sanitària Parc Taulí · ESHarvard University · USHospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia · ESHospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de Candelaria · ESHospital Virgen de la Luz · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe PaO2/FiO2 is an integral part of the assessment of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The American-European Consensus Conference definition does not mandate any standardization procedure. We hypothesized that the use of PaO2/FiO2 calculated under a standard ventilatory setting within 24 h of ARDS diagnosis allows a more clinically relevant ARDS classification.

methodsWe studied 452 ARDS patients enrolled prospectively in two independent, multicenter cohorts treated with protective mechanical ventilation. At the time of ARDS diagnosis, patients had a PaO2/FiO2 ≤ 200. In the derivation cohort (n = 170), we measured PaO2/FiO2 with two levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) (≥ 5 and ≥ 10 cmH2O) and two levels of FiO2 (≥ 0.5 and 1.0) at ARDS onset and 24 h later. Dependent upon PaO2 response, patients were reclassified into three groups: mild (PaO2/FiO2 > 200), moderate (PaO2/FiO2 101-200), and severe (PaO2/FiO2 ≤ 100) ARDS. The primary outcome measure was ICU mortality. The standard ventilatory setting that reached the highest significance difference in mortality among these categories was tested in a separate cohort (n = 282).

resultsThe only standard ventilatory setting that identified the three PaO2/FiO2 risk categories in the derivation cohort was PEEP ≥ 10 cmH2O and FiO2 ≥ 0.5 at 24 h after ARDS onset (p = 0.0001). Using this ventilatory setting, patients in the validation cohort were reclassified as having mild ARDS (n = 47, mortality 17 %), moderate ARDS (n = 149, mortality 40.9 %), and severe ARDS (n = 86, mortality 58.1 %) (p = 0.00001).

conclusionsOur method for assessing PaO2/FiO2 greatly improved risk stratification of ARDS and could be used for enrolling appropriate ARDS patients into therapeutic clinical trials.

Indexed as

AdultBlood Gas AnalysisHumansPositive-Pressure RespirationProspective StudiesPulmonary Gas ExchangeRespiratory Distress SyndromeSeverity of Illness Index

Identifiers

PMID23370826
OpenAlexW2012475675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.