Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23369649›Full record

ArticleSkeletal muscle2013

Satellite cell therapy - from mice to men.

Akshay Bareja, Andrew N Billin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Skeletal muscle, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Muscle stem cells and rotator cuff injury.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2021
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Cell therapy to improve regeneration of skeletal muscle injuries.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2019
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Transplantation of Allogeneic PW1JACC. Basic to translational science · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Gene and cell therapy for muscle regeneration.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2015
    Article
  16. Stem cell activation in skeletal muscle regeneration.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2015
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Akshay BarejaGlaxoSmithKline, 5 Moore Drive, Research Triangle Park, Durham, NC, 27709, USA. andrew.n.billin@gsk.com.
Andrew N Billin

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Satellite cells are rare mononuclear skeletal muscle-resident cells that are the chief contributors to regenerative myogenesis following muscle injury. Although first identified more than 50 years ago, it is only recently that the murine satellite cell has become molecularly defined with the ability to prospectively isolate these cells from their niche. Human satellite cells are considerably less well understood with relatively few studies having been performed on them. In this review, a critical evaluation of this literature is provided along with a discussion of the practical and methodological issues involved with research on human satellite cells. The therapeutic potential of these and other cells types is also discussed, and the various challenges that face satellite cell therapy are addressed.

Identifiers

PMID23369649
PMCPMC3579761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.