Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23369412›Full record

Trial reportThe Lancet. Infectious diseases2013

Safety and immunogenicity of an oral, replicating adenovirus serotype 4 vector vaccine for H5N1 influenza: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1 study.

Marc Gurwith, Michael Lock, Eve M Taylor, Glenn Ishioka, Jeff Alexander, Tim Mayall, John E Ervin, Richard N Greenberg, Cynthia Strout, John J Treanor and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Lancet. Infectious diseases, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01006798 (Phase 1 Evaluation of the Safety and Immunogenicity of a Replication-Competent Adenovirus Serotype 4-vectored H5N1 Influenza Candidate Vaccine - Ad4-H5-Vtn), which is not on this map. Cited by 97 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
97citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
13.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01006798 phase1completednot on this map

Phase 1 Evaluation of the Safety and Immunogenicity of a Replication-Competent Adenovirus Serotype 4-vectored H5N1 Influenza Candidate Vaccine - Ad4-H5-Vtn

TypeinterventionalSponsorEmergent BioSolutionsRan2009 to 2011Enrolled166ConditionsBird Flu, InfluenzaArmsPlacebo, Ad4-H5-Vtn, Sanofi Pasteur Influenza Virus Vaccine, H5N1
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

97 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 154 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Mucosal immune response in biology, disease prevention and treatment.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Viral vector-based influenza vaccines.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2016
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Developing the next-generation of adenoviral vector vaccines.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

37 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Marc GurwithPaxVax, San Diego, CA, USA. mgurwith@paxvax.com
Michael Lock
Eve M Taylor
Glenn Ishioka
Jeff Alexander
Tim Mayall
John E Ervin
Richard N Greenberg
Cynthia Strout
John J Treanor
Richard Webby
Peter F Wright
PAX Scientific (United States) · USPaxVax (United States) · USDartmouth College · USSt. Jude Children's Research Hospital · USUniversity of Kentucky · USUniversity of Rochester · US

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReplication-competent virus vector vaccines might have advantages compared with non-replicating vector vaccines. We tested the safety and immunogenicity of an oral adenovirus serotype 4 vector vaccine candidate (Ad4-H5-Vtn) expressing the haemagglutinin from an avian influenza A H5N1 virus.

methodsWe did this phase 1 study at four sites in the USA. We used a computer-generated randomisation list (block size eight, stratified by site) to assign healthy volunteers aged 18-40 years to receive one of five doses of Ad4-H5-Vtn (10(7) viral particles [VP], 10(8) VP, 10(9) VP, 10(10) VP, 10(11) VP) or placebo (3:1). Vaccine or placebo was given on three occasions, about 56 days apart. Participants, investigators, and study-site personnel were masked to assignment throughout the study. Subsequently, volunteers received a boost dose with 90 μg of an inactivated parenteral H5N1 vaccine. Primary immunogenicity endpoints were seroconversion by haemagglutination-inhibition (HAI), defined as a four-times rise compared with baseline titre, and HAI geometric mean titre (GMT). We solicited symptoms of reactogenicity daily for 7 days after each vaccination and recorded symptoms that persisted beyond 7 days as adverse events. Primary analysis was per protocol. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01006798.

findingsWe enrolled 166 participants (125 vaccine; 41 placebo) between Oct 19, 2009, and Sept 9, 2010. HAI responses were low: 13 of 123 vaccinees (11%, 95% CI 6-17) and three of 41 placebo recipients (7%, 2-20) seroconverted. HAI GMT was 6 (95% CI 5-7) for vaccinees, and 5 (5-6) for placebo recipients. However, when inactivated H5N1 vaccine became available, one H5N1 boost was offered to all participants. In this substudy, HAI seroconversion occurred in 19 of 19 participants in the 10(11) VP cohort (100%; 95% CI 82-100) and eight of 22 placebo recipients (36%; 17-59); 17 of 19 participants in the 10(11) VP cohort (89%; 67-99) achieved seroprotection compared with four of 22 placebo recipients (18%; 5-40); GMT was 135 (89-205) with 10(11) VP, compared with 13 (7-21) with placebo. The cumulative frequency of abdominal pain, diarrhoea, and nasal congestion after all three vaccinations was significantly higher in vaccinees than placebo recipients (21 [16·8%] of 125 vs one [2·4%] of 41, p=0·017; 24 [19·2%] of 125 vs two [4·9%] of 41, p=0·027; 41 [32·8%] of 125 vs six [14·6%] of 41, p=0·028; respectively). No serious treatment-related adverse events occurred.

interpretationOral Ad4 vector priming might enhance the efficacy of poorly immunogenic vaccines such as H5N1.

fundingWellcome Trust Foundation, PaxVax.

Indexed as

Abdominal PainAdenoviridaeAdministration, OralAdolescentAdultConfidence IntervalsDiarrheaDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHemagglutination Inhibition TestsHumansInfluenza A Virus, H5N1 SubtypeInfluenza VaccinesMaleStatistics, NonparametricVaccines, InactivatedInfluenza VaccinesVaccines, Inactivated

Identifiers

PMID23369412
PMCPMC3576519
OpenAlexW2083824233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.