Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23369360›Full record

Trial reportBMC surgery2013

Cost-effectiveness of laser Doppler imaging in burn care in the Netherlands.

M Jenda Hop, Jakob Hiddingh, Carlijn Stekelenburg, Hester C Kuipers, Esther Middelkoop, Marianne K Nieuwenhuis, Suzanne Polinder, Margriet E van Baar, LDI study group

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC surgery, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01489540 (Cost-effectiveness of Laser Doppler Imaging in Burn Care in the Netherlands), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01489540 nacompletednot on this map

Cost-effectiveness of Laser Doppler Imaging in Burn Care in the Netherlands

TypeinterventionalSponsorAssociation of Dutch Burn CentresRan2011 to 2013Enrolled200ConditionsBurnsArmslaser Doppler imager (Moor)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Burns: Classification, Pathophysiology, and Treatment: A Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. New technologies in global burn care - a review of recent advances.International journal of burns and trauma · 2018
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

M Jenda HopAssociation of Dutch Burn Centres, Red Cross Hospital, Beverwijk, the Netherlands.
Jakob Hiddingh
Carlijn Stekelenburg
Hester C Kuipers
Esther Middelkoop
Marianne K Nieuwenhuis
Suzanne Polinder
Margriet E van Baar
LDI study group
Association of Dutch Burn Centres · NLMartini Ziekenhuis · NLErasmus University Rotterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly accurate assessment of burn depth is important to determine the optimal treatment of burns. The method most used to determine burn depth is clinical assessment, which is the least expensive, but not the most accurate.Laser Doppler imaging (LDI) is a technique with which a more accurate (>95%) estimate of burn depth can be made by measuring the dermal perfusion. The actual effect on therapeutic decisions, clinical outcomes and the costs of the introduction of this device, however, are unknown. Before we decide to implement LDI in Dutch burn care, a study on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of LDI is necessary. METHODS/

designA multicenter randomised controlled trial will be conducted in the Dutch burn centres: Beverwijk, Groningen and Rotterdam. All patients treated as outpatient or admitted to a burn centre within 5 days post burn, with burns of indeterminate depth (burns not obviously superficial or full thickness) and a total body surface area burned of ≤ 20% are eligible. A total of 200 patients will be included. Burn depth will be diagnosed by both clinical assessment and laser Doppler imaging between 2-5 days post burn in all patients. Subsequently, patients are randomly divided in two groups: 'new diagnostic strategy' versus 'current diagnostic strategy'. The results of the LDI-scan will only be provided to the treating clinician in the 'new diagnostic strategy' group. The main endpoint is the effect of LDI on wound healing time.In addition we measure: a) the effect of LDI on other patient outcomes (quality of life, scar quality), b) the effect of LDI on diagnostic and therapeutic decisions, and c) the effect of LDI on total (medical and non-medical) costs and cost-effectiveness. DISCUSSION: This trial will contribute to our current knowledge on the use of LDI in burn care and will provide evidence on its cost-effectiveness.

trial registrationNCT01489540.

Indexed as

BurnsBurn UnitsCicatrixCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansLength of StayNetherlandsQuality of LifeTime FactorsUltrasonography, Doppler

Identifiers

PMID23369360
PMCPMC3574826
OpenAlexW2151366200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.