Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23369320›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of emergency surgery : WJES2013

Peritoneal adhesion index (PAI): proposal of a score for the "ignored iceberg" of medicine and surgery.

Federico Coccolini, Luca Ansaloni, Roberto Manfredi, Luca Campanati, Elia Poiasina, Paolo Bertoli, Michela Giulii Capponi, Massimo Sartelli, Salomone Di Saverio, Michele Cucchi and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of emergency surgery : WJES, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Long-term assessment of nephrosplenic space closure in horses.Canadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Federico CoccoliniGeneral and Emergency Surgery department, Papa Giovanni XXIII hospital, Piazza OMS-Organizzazione Mondiale della Sanità 1, 24128, Bergamo, Italy. federico.coccolini@gmail.com.
Luca Ansaloni
Roberto Manfredi
Luca Campanati
Elia Poiasina
Paolo Bertoli
Michela Giulii Capponi
Massimo Sartelli
Salomone Di Saverio
Michele Cucchi
Daniel Lazzareschi
Michele Pisano
Fausto Catena

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peritoneal adhesions describe a condition in which pathological bonds form between the omentum, the small and large bowels, the abdominal wall, and other intra-abdominal organs. Different classification systems have been proposed, but they do not resolve the underlying problem of ambiguity in the quantification and definition of adhesions. We therefore propose a standardized classification system of adhesions to universalize their definition based on the macroscopic appearance of adhesions and their diffusion to different regions of the abdomen. By scoring with these criteria, the peritoneal adhesion index (PAI) can range from 0 to 30, unambiguously specifying precise adhesion scenarios. The standardized classification and quantification of adhesions would enable different studies to more meaningfully integrate their results, thereby facilitating a more comprehensive approach to the treatment and management of this pathology.

Identifiers

PMID23369320
PMCPMC3573980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.