Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23369156›Full record

ArticleTechnology in cancer research & treatment2013

A comparative evaluation of ultrasound molecular imaging, perfusion imaging, and volume measurements in evaluating response to therapy in patient-derived xenografts.

J E Streeter, S G Herrera-Loeza, N F Neel, J J Yeh, P A Dayton

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Technology in cancer research & treatment, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Structure and Stability of Phospholipid-Based Microbubbles Studied Using a Spin Probe.Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Biomarkers in preclinical cancer imaging.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2015
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Current status and prospects for microbubbles in ultrasound theranostics.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

J E StreeterJoint Department of Biomedical _Engineering, University of North _Carolina, North Carolina State _University, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. padayton@bme.unc.edu.
S G Herrera-Loeza
N F Neel
J J Yeh
P A Dayton

Funding

Tissue Procurement & PathologyP50CA058223 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KATHERINE A. HOADLEY · 1992 to 2026
$59.3M
Targeting Ras-Ral GEF-Ral Effector Signaling for Pancreatic Cancer TreatmentR01CA140424 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI YEH, JEN JEN · 2010 to 2014
$1.5M
Immune-Shielded, Ultrasound-Stimulated Contrast Agents for Molecular ImagingR01EB009066 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI BORDEN, MARK ANDREW, DAYTON, PAUL A · 2008 to 2011
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA058223NCI NIH HHS R01 CA140424NCI NIH HHS R01CA140424NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB009066
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most pre-clinical therapy studies use the change in tumor volume as a measure for disease response. However, tumor size measurements alone may not reflect early changes in tumor physiology that occur as a response to treatment. Ultrasonic molecular imaging (USMI) and Dynamic Contrast Enhanced-Perfusion Imaging (DCE-PI) with ultrasound are two attractive alternatives to tumor volume measurements. Since these techniques can provide information prior to the appearance of gross phenotypic changes, it has been proposed that USMI and DCE-PI could be used to characterize response to treatment earlier than traditional methods. This study evaluated the ability of tumor volume measurements, DCE-PI, and USMI to characterize response to therapy in two different types of patient-derived xenografts (known responders and known non-responders). For both responders and non-responders, 7 animals received a dose of 30 mg/kg of MLN8237, an investigational aurora-A kinase inhibitor, for 14 days or a vehicle control. Volumetric USMI (target integrin:α av β3) and DCE-PI were performed on day 0, day 2, day 7, and day 14 in the same animals. For USMI, day 2 was the earliest point at which there was a statistical difference between the untreated and treated populations in the responder cohort (Untreated: 1.20 ± 0.53 vs. Treated: 0.49 ± 0.40; p < 0.05). In contrast, statistically significant differences between the untreated and treated populations as detected using DCE-PI were not observed until day 14 (Untreated: 0.94 ± 0.23 vs. Treated: 1.31 ± 0.22; p < 0.05). Volume measurements alone suggested no statistical differences between treated and untreated populations at any readpoint. Monitoring volumetric changes is the "gold standard" for evaluating treatment in pre-clinical studies, however, our data suggests that volumetric USMI and DCE-PI may be used to earlier classify and robustly characterize tumor response.

Indexed as

Tumor BurdenXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysAnimalsAzepinesContrast MediaHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMiceMolecular ImagingPerfusion ImagingPyrimidinesUltrasonicsAzepinesContrast MediaMLN 8237Pyrimidines

Identifiers

PMID23369156
PMCPMC4431574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.