ArticleBMC genomics2013
Comparison of class 2 transposable elements at superfamily resolution reveals conserved and distinct features in cereal grass genomes.
Article in BMC genomics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Repeatome in the Mega-GenusGenes · 2026Article
- Graphical pangenomics-enabled characterization of structural variant impact on gene expression in Brassica napus.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025Article
- Genome-wide characterization and evolution analysis of miniature inverted-repeat transposable elements in Barley (Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Comparative Analysis of Transposable Elements in Strawberry Genomes of Different Ploidy Levels.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Rates and spectra of de novo structural mutations inGenome research · 2023Article
- Resetting of the 24-nt siRNA landscape in rice zygotes.Genome research · 2022Article
- The genomic ecosystem of transposable elements in maize.PLoS genetics · 2021Article
- Perspective: 50 years of plant chromosome biology.Plant physiology · 2021Article
- Assessing the regulatory potential of transposable elements using chromatin accessibility profiles of maize transposons.Genetics · 2021Article
- Genome-wide redistribution of 24-nt siRNAs in rice gametes.Genome research · 2020Article
- Transposition of a non-autonomous DNA transposon in the gene coding for a bHLH transcription factor results in a white bulb color of onions (Allium cepa L.).TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2020Article
- Benchmarking transposable element annotation methods for creation of a streamlined, comprehensive pipeline.Genome biology · 2019Article
- The bracteatus pineapple genome and domestication of clonally propagated crops.Nature genetics · 2019Article
- Distribution and Characteristics of Transposable Elements in the Mulberry Genome.The plant genome · 2019Article
- Structural variants in 3000 rice genomes.Genome research · 2019Article
- Comparative analysis of miniature inverted-repeat transposable elements (MITEs) and long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons in six Citrus species.BMC plant biology · 2019Article
- Article
- LTR_retriever: A Highly Accurate and Sensitive Program for Identification of Long Terminal Repeat Retrotransposons.Plant physiology · 2018Article
- QTL Mapping Combined With Comparative Analyses Identified Candidate Genes for Reduced Shattering inFrontiers in plant science · 2018Article
- Tracking the genome-wide outcomes of a transposable element burst over decades of amplification.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundClass 2 transposable elements (TEs) are the predominant elements in and around plant genes where they generate significant allelic diversity. Using the complete sequences of four grasses, we have performed a novel comparative analysis of class 2 TEs. To ensure consistent comparative analyses, we re-annotated class 2 TEs in Brachypodium distachyon, Oryza sativa (rice), Sorghum bicolor and Zea mays and assigned them to one of the five cut-and-paste superfamilies found in plant genomes (Tc1/mariner, PIF/Harbinger, hAT, Mutator, CACTA). We have focused on noncoding elements because of their abundance, and compared superfamily copy number, size and genomic distribution as well as correlation with the level of nearby gene expression.
resultsOur comparison revealed both unique and conserved features. First, the average length or size distribution of elements in each superfamily is largely conserved, with the shortest always being Tc1/mariner elements, followed by PIF/Harbinger, hAT, Mutator and CACTA. This order also holds for the ratio of the copy numbers of noncoding to coding elements. Second, with the exception of CACTAs, noncoding TEs are enriched within and flanking genes, where they display conserved distribution patterns, having the highest peak in the promoter region. Finally, our analysis of microarray data revealed that genes associated with Tc1/mariner and PIF/Harbinger noncoding elements have significantly higher expression levels than genes without class 2 TEs. In contrast, genes with CACTA elements have significantly lower expression than genes without class 2 TEs.
conclusionsWe have achieved the most comprehensive annotation of class 2 TEs to date in these four grass genomes. Comparative analysis of this robust dataset led to the identification of several previously unknown features of each superfamily related to copy number, element size, genomic distribution and correlation with the expression levels of nearby genes. These results highlight the importance of distinguishing TE superfamilies when assessing their impact on gene and genome evolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.