Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23368932›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2013

High quality de novo sequencing and assembly of the Saccharomyces arboricolus genome.

Gianni Liti, Alex N Nguyen Ba, Martin Blythe, Carolin A Müller, Anders Bergström, Francisco A Cubillos, Felix Dafhnis-Calas, Shima Khoshraftar, Sunir Malla, Neel Mehta and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Unique Brewing-Relevant Properties of a Strain ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Gianni LitiInstitute of Research on Cancer and Ageing of Nice (IRCAN), CNRS UMR 7284 - INSERM U1081, Université de Nice Sophia Antipolis, 06107, NICE Cedex 2, France. Gianni.Liti@unice.fr
Alex N Nguyen Ba
Martin Blythe
Carolin A Müller
Anders Bergström
Francisco A Cubillos
Felix Dafhnis-Calas
Shima Khoshraftar
Sunir Malla
Neel Mehta
Cheuk C Siow
Jonas Warringer
Alan M Moses
Edward J Louis
Conrad A Nieduszynski

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/E023754/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/G001596/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundComparative genomics is a formidable tool to identify functional elements throughout a genome. In the past ten years, studies in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and a set of closely related species have been instrumental in showing the benefit of analyzing patterns of sequence conservation. Increasing the number of closely related genome sequences makes the comparative genomics approach more powerful and accurate.

resultsHere, we report the genome sequence and analysis of Saccharomyces arboricolus, a yeast species recently isolated in China, that is closely related to S. cerevisiae. We obtained high quality de novo sequence and assemblies using a combination of next generation sequencing technologies, established the phylogenetic position of this species and considered its phenotypic profile under multiple environmental conditions in the light of its gene content and phylogeny.

conclusionsWe suggest that the genome of S. arboricolus will be useful in future comparative genomics analysis of the Saccharomyces sensu stricto yeasts.

Indexed as

Genes, FungalGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingInternetMolecular Sequence AnnotationPhenotypePhylogenySaccharomycesSpecies Specificity

Identifiers

PMID23368932
PMCPMC3599269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.