Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23368927›Full record

ArticleBMC medical research methodology2013

From accuracy to patient outcome and cost-effectiveness evaluations of diagnostic tests and biomarkers: an exemplary modelling study.

Hendrik Koffijberg, Bas van Zaane, Karel G M Moons

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. How accurate should a precision medical test be to meet cost-effectiveness.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Cost-effectiveness of one-stop-shop [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Toward Alignment in the Reporting of Economic Evaluations of Diagnostic Tests and Biomarkers: The AGREEDT Checklist.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2018
    Review
  10. Biomarkers: Delivering on the expectation of molecularly driven, quantitative health.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2018
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Methodologic approaches to evaluating new highly sensitive diagnostic tests: avoiding overdiagnosis.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2017
    Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hendrik KoffijbergJulius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Mailstop STR 6.131, P.O. Box 85500, 3508, Utrecht, GA, The Netherlands. h.koffijberg@umcutrecht.nl
Bas van Zaane
Karel G M Moons
University Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProper evaluation of new diagnostic tests is required to reduce overutilization and to limit potential negative health effects and costs related to testing. A decision analytic modelling approach may be worthwhile when a diagnostic randomized controlled trial is not feasible. We demonstrate this by assessing the cost-effectiveness of modified transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) compared with manual palpation for the detection of atherosclerosis in the ascending aorta.

methodsBased on a previous diagnostic accuracy study, actual Dutch reimbursement data, and evidence from literature we developed a Markov decision analytic model. Cost-effectiveness of modified TEE was assessed for a life time horizon and a health care perspective. Prevalence rates of atherosclerosis were age-dependent and low as well as high rates were applied. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was applied.

resultsThe model synthesized all available evidence on the risk of stroke in cardiac surgery patients. The modified TEE strategy consistently resulted in more adapted surgical procedures and, hence, a lower risk of stroke and a slightly higher number of life-years. With 10% prevalence of atherosclerosis the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was € 4,651 and € 481 per quality-adjusted life year in 55-year-old men and women, respectively. In all patients aged 65 years or older the modified TEE strategy was cost saving and resulted in additional health benefits.

conclusionsDecision analytic modelling to assess the cost-effectiveness of a new diagnostic test based on characteristics, costs and effects of the test itself and of the subsequent treatment options is both feasible and valuable. Our case study on modified TEE suggests that it may reduce the risk of stroke in cardiac surgery patients older than 55 years at acceptable cost-effectiveness levels.

Indexed as

Echocardiography, TransesophagealAgedCoronary Artery DiseaseCost-Benefit AnalysisDecision Support TechniquesFemaleHumansMaleMarkov ChainsMiddle AgedPalpationRiskSensitivity and SpecificityStrokeThoracic SurgeryTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID23368927
PMCPMC3724486
OpenAlexW2148103899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.