ArticleBMC bioinformatics2013
Visualization of protein interaction networks: problems and solutions.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multimodal SARS-CoV-2 interactome sketches the virus-host spatial organization.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Scoliosis Management through Apps and Software Tools.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Review
- Challenges and Limitations of Biological Network Analysis.Biotech (Basel (Switzerland)) · 2022Article
- Diabetes mellitus susceptibility with varied diseased phenotypes and its comparison with phenome interactome networks.World journal of clinical cases · 2022Review
- Overview of methods for characterization and visualization of a protein-protein interaction network in a multi-omics integration context.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022Review
- Analysis of Multifactor-Driven Myopia Disease Modules to Guide Personalized Treatment and Drug Development.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Article
- Deciphering the Crosstalk Mechanisms of Wheat-Stem Rust Pathosystem: Genome-Scale Prediction Unravels Novel Host Targets.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Systematic Understanding of the Mechanism of Baicalin against Gastric Cancer Using Transcriptome Analysis.BioMed research international · 2021Article
- Cross-ID: Analysis and Visualization of Complex XL-MS-Driven Protein Interaction Networks.Journal of proteome research · 2019Article
- Filaments and phenotypes: cellular roles and orphan effects associated with mutations in cytoplasmic intermediate filament proteins.F1000Research · 2019Review
- Prognostic value of DKK2 from the Dickkopf family in human breast cancer.International journal of oncology · 2018Article
- INTERSPIA: a web application for exploring the dynamics of protein-protein interactions among multiple species.Nucleic acids research · 2018Article
- Development of an in silico method for the identification of subcomplexes involved in the biogenesis of multiprotein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.BMC systems biology · 2017Article
- Advantages of mixing bioinformatics and visualization approaches for analyzing sRNA-mediated regulatory bacterial networks.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2015Article
- Integrated web visualizations for protein-protein interaction databases.BMC bioinformatics · 2015Article
- A web-based protein interaction network visualizer.BMC bioinformatics · 2014Article
- PPI layouts: BioJS components for the display of Protein-Protein Interactions.F1000Research · 2014Article
- Pclust: protein network visualization highlighting experimental data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVisualization concerns the representation of data visually and is an important task in scientific research. Protein-protein interactions (PPI) are discovered using either wet lab techniques, such mass spectrometry, or in silico predictions tools, resulting in large collections of interactions stored in specialized databases. The set of all interactions of an organism forms a protein-protein interaction network (PIN) and is an important tool for studying the behaviour of the cell machinery. Since graphic representation of PINs may highlight important substructures, e.g. protein complexes, visualization is more and more used to study the underlying graph structure of PINs. Although graphs are well known data structures, there are different open problems regarding PINs visualization: the high number of nodes and connections, the heterogeneity of nodes (proteins) and edges (interactions), the possibility to annotate proteins and interactions with biological information extracted by ontologies (e.g. Gene Ontology) that enriches the PINs with semantic information, but complicates their visualization.
methodsIn these last years many software tools for the visualization of PINs have been developed. Initially thought for visualization only, some of them have been successively enriched with new functions for PPI data management and PIN analysis. The paper analyzes the main software tools for PINs visualization considering four main criteria: (i) technology, i.e. availability/license of the software and supported OS (Operating System) platforms; (ii) interoperability, i.e. ability to import/export networks in various formats, ability to export data in a graphic format, extensibility of the system, e.g. through plug-ins; (iii) visualization, i.e. supported layout and rendering algorithms and availability of parallel implementation; (iv) analysis, i.e. availability of network analysis functions, such as clustering or mining of the graph, and the possibility to interact with external databases.
resultsCurrently, many tools are available and it is not easy for the users choosing one of them. Some tools offer sophisticated 2D and 3D network visualization making available many layout algorithms, others tools are more data-oriented and support integration of interaction data coming from different sources and data annotation. Finally, some specialistic tools are dedicated to the analysis of pathways and cellular processes and are oriented toward systems biology studies, where the dynamic aspects of the processes being studied are central.
conclusionA current trend is the deployment of open, extensible visualization tools (e.g. Cytoscape), that may be incrementally enriched by the interactomics community with novel and more powerful functions for PIN analysis, through the development of plug-ins. On the other hand, another emerging trend regards the efficient and parallel implementation of the visualization engine that may provide high interactivity and near real-time response time, as in NAViGaTOR. From a technological point of view, open-source, free and extensible tools, like Cytoscape, guarantee a long term sustainability due to the largeness of the developers and users communities, and provide a great flexibility since new functions are continuously added by the developer community through new plug-ins, but the emerging parallel, often closed-source tools like NAViGaTOR, can offer near real-time response time also in the analysis of very huge PINs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.