Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23368518›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2013

A multispecies polyadenylation site model.

Eric S Ho, Samuel I Gunderson, Siobain Duffy

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Inference of the human polyadenylation code.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2018
    Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Eric S HoDepartment of Molecular Genetics, Microbiology and Immunology, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA. eric.ho@umdnj.edu
Samuel I Gunderson
Siobain Duffy

Funding

IRACDA at Rutgers: INSPIRE Postdoctoral Training ProgramK12GM093854 · NIGMS · UNIV OF MED/DENT NJ-R W JOHNSON MED SCH · PI Detlev Boison, Gary A. Brewer · 2010 to 2026
$14.7M
Regulation of Polyadenylation: the U1A/U1snRNP ParadigmR01GM057286 · NIGMS · RUTGERS THE ST UNIV OF NJ NEW BRUNSWICK · PI GUNDERSON, SAMUEL I · 1999 to 2007
$2.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM57286NIGMS NIH HHS K12 GM093854-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPolyadenylation is present in all three domains of life, making it the most conserved post-transcriptional process compared with splicing and 5'-capping. Even though most mammalian poly(A) sites contain a highly conserved hexanucleotide in the upstream region and a far less conserved U/GU-rich sequence in the downstream region, there are many exceptions. Furthermore, poly(A) sites in other species, such as plants and invertebrates, exhibit high deviation from this genomic structure, making the construction of a general poly(A) site recognition model challenging. We surveyed nine poly(A) site prediction methods published between 1999 and 2011. All methods exploit the skewed nucleotide profile across the poly(A) sites, and the highly conserved poly(A) signal as the primary features for recognition. These methods typically use a large number of features, which increases the dimensionality of the models to crippling degrees, and typically are not validated against many kinds of genomes.

resultsWe propose a poly(A) site model that employs minimal features to capture the essence of poly(A) sites, and yet, produces better prediction accuracy across diverse species. Our model consists of three dior-trinucleotide profiles identified through principle component analysis, and the predicted nucleosome occupancy flanking the poly(A) sites. We validated our model using two machine learning methods: logistic regression and linear discriminant analysis. Results show that models achieve 85-92% sensitivity and 85-96% specificity in seven animals and plants. When we applied one model from one species to predict poly(A) sites from other species, the sensitivity scores correlate with phylogenetic distances.

conclusionsA four-feature model geared towards small motifs was sufficient to accurately learn and predict poly(A) sites across eukaryotes.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceModels, TheoreticalPolyadenylationAnimalsConserved SequenceDiscriminant AnalysisLogistic ModelsNucleosomesPhylogenyPlantsPoly APrincipal Component AnalysisRNA, MessengerSensitivity and SpecificityNucleosomesPoly ARNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID23368518
PMCPMC3549828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.