Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23365446›Full record

ArticleJournal of virology2013

Structural and thermodynamic basis of amprenavir/darunavir and atazanavir resistance in HIV-1 protease with mutations at residue 50.

Seema Mittal, Rajinthna M Bandaranayake, Nancy M King, Moses Prabu-Jeyabalan, Madhavi N L Nalam, Ellen A Nalivaika, Nese Kurt Yilmaz, Celia A Schiffer

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Structural basis and distal effects of Gag substrate coevolution in drug resistance to HIV-1 protease.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Seema MittalDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.
Rajinthna M Bandaranayake
Nancy M King
Moses Prabu-Jeyabalan
Madhavi N L Nalam
Ellen A Nalivaika
Nese Kurt Yilmaz
Celia A Schiffer
University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · US

Funding

X-RAY STUDY OF HORMONE-RECEPTOR AND PROTEIN-ANTIBODY COMPLEXESP41RR007707 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI YANG, XIANGZHONG · 2002 to 2011
$17.3M
Targeting ensembles of Drug Resistant HIV ProteasesP01GM066524 · NIGMS · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI SCHIFFER, CELIA A. · 2002 to 2011
$16.3M
Macromolecular Crystallographic HighFlux Home Lab X-ray Diffraction SystemS10OD012028 · OD · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI SCHIFFER, CELIA A. · 2012 to 2012
$531k
NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR007707NCRR NIH HHS RR007707NIGMS NIH HHS P01 GM066524NIGMS NIH HHS P01-GM66524NIH HHS S10 OD012028
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug resistance occurs through a series of subtle changes that maintain substrate recognition but no longer permit inhibitor binding. In HIV-1 protease, mutations at I50 are associated with such subtle changes that confer differential resistance to specific inhibitors. Residue I50 is located at the protease flap tips, closing the active site upon ligand binding. Under selective drug pressure, I50V/L substitutions emerge in patients, compromising drug susceptibility and leading to treatment failure. The I50V substitution is often associated with amprenavir (APV) and darunavir (DRV) resistance, while the I50L substitution is observed in patients failing atazanavir (ATV) therapy. To explain how APV, DRV, and ATV susceptibility are influenced by mutations at residue 50 in HIV-1 protease, structural and binding thermodynamics studies were carried out on I50V/L-substituted protease variants in the compensatory mutation A71V background. Reduced affinity to both I50V/A71V and I50L/A71V double mutants is largely due to decreased binding entropy, which is compensated for by enhanced enthalpy for ATV binding to I50V variants and APV binding to I50L variants, leading to hypersusceptibility in these two cases. Analysis of the crystal structures showed that the substitutions at residue 50 affect how APV, DRV, and ATV bind the protease with altered van der Waals interactions and that the selection of I50V versus I50L is greatly influenced by the chemical moieties at the P1 position for APV/DRV and the P2 position for ATV. Thus, the varied inhibitor susceptibilities of I50V/L protease variants are largely a direct consequence of the interdependent changes in protease inhibitor interactions.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, ViralMutation, MissenseAnti-HIV AgentsAtazanavir SulfateCarbamatesCrystallography, X-RayDarunavirFuransHIV-1HIV ProteaseHumansKineticsModels, MolecularMutant ProteinsOligopeptidesPoint MutationamprenavirAnti-HIV AgentsAtazanavir SulfateCarbamatesDarunavirFuransHIV ProteaseMutant ProteinsOligopeptidesp16 protease, Human immunodeficiency virus 1PyridinesSulfonamides

Identifiers

PMID23365446
PMCPMC3624360
OpenAlexW2083437452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.