Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23365205›Full record

ArticleClinical and vaccine immunology : CVI2013

A single electroporation delivery of a DNA vaccine containing the hemagglutinin gene of Asian H5N1 avian influenza virus generated a protective antibody response in chickens against a North American virus strain.

Oladele Ogunremi, John Pasick, Gary P Kobinger, Drew Hannaman, Yohannes Berhane, Alfonso Clavijo, Sylvia van Drunen Littel-van den Hurk

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Electroporation-mediated gene delivery.Advances in genetics · 2015
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Needle-free delivery of an inactivated avian influenza H5N3 virus vaccine elicits potent antibody responses in chickens.Canadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Oladele OgunremiOttawa Laboratory (Fallowfield), Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
John Pasick
Gary P Kobinger
Drew Hannaman
Yohannes Berhane
Alfonso Clavijo
Sylvia van Drunen Littel-van den Hurk
Canadian Food Inspection Agency · CAIchor Medical Systems (United States) · USPublic Health Agency of Canada · CAUniversity of Saskatchewan · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protection against the avian influenza (AI) H5N1 virus is suspected to be mainly conferred by the presence of antibodies directed against the hemagglutinin (HA) protein of the virus. A single electroporation delivery of 100 or 250 μg of a DNA vaccine construct, pCAG-HA, carrying the HA gene of strain A/Hanoi/30408/2005 (H5N1), in chickens led to the development of anti-HA antibody response in 16 of 17 immunized birds, as measured by a hemagglutination inhibition (HI) test, competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (cELISA), and an indirect ELISA. Birds vaccinated by electroporation (n = 11) were protected from experimental AI challenge with strain A/chicken/Pennsylvania/1370/1/1983 (H5N2) as judged by low viral load, absence of clinical symptoms, and absence of mortality (n = 11). In contrast, only two out of 10 birds vaccinated with the same vaccine dose (100 or 250 μg) but without electroporation developed antibodies. These birds showed high viral loads and significant morbidity and mortality after the challenge. Seroconversion was reduced in birds electroporated with a low vaccine dose (10 μg), but the antibody-positive birds were protected against virus challenge. Nonelectroporation delivery of a low-dose vaccine did not result in seroconversion, and the birds were as susceptible as those in the control groups that received the control pCAG vector. Electroporation delivery of the DNA vaccine led to enhanced antibody responses and to protection against the AI virus challenge. The HI test, cELISA, or indirect ELISA for anti-H5 antibodies might serve as a good predictor of the potency and efficacy of a DNA immunization strategy against AI in chickens.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, ViralChickensElectroporationEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayHemagglutination Inhibition TestsHemagglutinin Glycoproteins, Influenza VirusInfluenza A Virus, H5N1 SubtypeInfluenza in BirdsInfluenza VaccinesSurvival AnalysisVaccines, DNAViral LoadAntibodies, Viralhemagglutinin, avian influenza A virusHemagglutinin Glycoproteins, Influenza VirusInfluenza VaccinesVaccines, DNA

Identifiers

PMID23365205
PMCPMC3623422
OpenAlexW2164241251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.