Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23363837›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2013

Prevalence and characterization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from retail meat and humans in Georgia.

Charlene R Jackson, Johnnie A Davis, John B Barrett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Methicillin- and Vancomycin-ResistantFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Prophage typing ofIranian journal of microbiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Microorganisms · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Methicillin-resistantVeterinary world · 2024
    Review
  8. Clonal Flux and Spread ofMicroorganisms · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Prevalence and Virulence Determinants ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  16. Antimicrobial Resistance, Multilocus Sequence, andBioMed research international · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Prevalence and Characteristics ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  19. Occurrence of Multidrug-ResistantInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  20. Molecular Characterization ofMicroorganisms · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Charlene R JacksonBacterial Epidemiology and Antimicrobial Resistance Research Unit, USDA-ARS, Russell Research Center, Athens, Georgia, USA. charlene.jackson@ars.usda.gov
Johnnie A Davis
John B Barrett

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is increasing interest in the presence of Staphylococcus aureus, specifically methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), on retail meat products. In this study, staphylococci were isolated from retail pork and retail beef in Georgia, and MRSA from the products was compared to human MRSA from the same geographic area using broth microdilution antimicrobial susceptibility testing, multilocus sequence typing (MLST), spa typing, SCCmec typing, and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). S. aureus was isolated from 45% (45/100) of pork products and 63% (63/100) of beef products; mecA was detected in S. aureus from both pork (3/100; 3%) and beef (4/100; 4%). Fifty percent (50/100) of human S. aureus also contained mecA. Multidrug resistance was detected among MRSA from all sources. All MRSA (n = 57) was SCCmec type IV, and nine different spa types were present among the isolates (t002, t008, t012, t024, t179, t337, t548, t681, and t1062). Four sequence types (ST5, ST8, ST9, and ST30) were detected using MLST; the majority of MRSA isolates belonged to ST8, followed by ST5. One retail beef MRSA isolate belonged to ST8, while the remaining three were ST5. In retail pork MRSA, ST5, ST9, and ST30 were observed. The majority of human MRSA isolates belonged to ST8. Thirty-seven MRSA isolates, one of which was a retail beef MRSA isolate, were pvl(+). Using PFGE, MLST, and spa typing, three retail beef MRSA isolates were found to be identical in PFGE pattern, ST, and spa type to two human clonal MRSA isolates (USA100 and USA300). One additional retail beef MRSA isolate had a PFGE pattern similar to that of a human MRSA isolate, whereas none of the retail pork MRSA isolates had PFGE patterns similar to those of human MRSA isolates. These data suggest that the retail beef samples were contaminated by a human source, possibly during processing of the meat, and may present a source of MRSA for consumers and others who handle raw meat.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsCarrier StateCluster AnalysisDNA, BacterialDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialGenotypeGeorgiaHumansMeatMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMolecular EpidemiologyMolecular TypingPrevalenceStaphylococcal InfectionsAnti-Bacterial AgentsDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID23363837
PMCPMC3666775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.