ArticleThe oncologist2013
Publicly funded clinical trials and the future of cancer care.
Article in The oncologist, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Drug Costs in Federally Sponsored Cancer Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review.JAMA network open · 2026Pooled it
- Balancing global standards and regional nuances in breast cancer care: the role of guidelines, clinical research, precision medicine, and artificial intelligence in advancing quality of care for patients worldwide.Cancer biology & medicine · 2026Article
- Ensuring the Future of Cooperative Group Cancer Clinical Trials: A Call for Comprehensive Support and Prioritization.JCO oncology practice · 2026Article
- The Outcome and Impact of Academic Cancer Clinical Trials with Participation from Canadian Sites (2015-2024).Cancers · 2025Article
- The future of surgical research.The British journal of surgery · 2025Article
- Article
- Defining Clinical Utility of Germline Indicators of Toxicity Risk: A Perspective.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2022Article
- Reimbursement Matters: Overcoming Barriers to Clinical Trial Accrual.Medical care · 2021Article
- Modernizing Clinical Trial Eligibility Criteria: Recommendations of the ASCO-Friends of Cancer Research Prior Therapies Work Group.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2021Article
- Impact of investigator initiated trials and industry sponsored trials on medical practice (IMPACT): rationale and study design.BMC medical research methodology · 2020Article
- Budgeting of non-commercial clinical trials: development of a budget tool by a public funding agency.Trials · 2019Article
- Article
- Cartographic Mapping and Travel Burden to Assess and Develop Strategies to Improve Minority Access to National Cancer Clinical Trials.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2015Article
- Off-label use of anticancer drugs in eastern Switzerland: a population-based prospective cohort study.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2014Article
- Cancer clinical trials--do we need a new algorithm in the age of stratified medicine?The oncologist · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Publicly sponsored trials, conducted primarily by cooperative groups sponsored by the National Cancer Institute, and commercially sponsored trials are necessary to create new knowledge, improve the care of oncology patients, and develop new drugs and devices. Commercial sponsors launch clinical trials that will result in drug approval, label extension, expansion of market share, and an increase in shareholder value. Conversely, publicly sponsored trials seek to optimize therapy for a particular disease, create new knowledge, and improve public health; these trials can also result in label extension of a drug and even in initial drug approval. Publicly sponsored trials may combine and/or compare drugs developed by different commercial sponsors, develop multimodality therapies (e.g., the combination of chemotherapy and radiation), or develop novel treatment schedules or routes of drug administration (e.g., intraperitoneal chemotherapy). Publicly sponsored trials are more likely to focus on therapies for rare diseases and to study survivorship and quality of life; these areas may not be a priority for commercial entities. Screening and prevention strategies have been developed almost exclusively by the public sector given the large sample size and long follow-up period needed to complete the trial and, therefore, the lack of short-term commercial gain. Finally, given the public nature of the funding, clinical investigators are expected to publish their results even if the outcomes are unfavorable for the investigational therapy. With the ongoing reorganization of the cooperative groups to form a national clinical trials network, opportunities exist to create a robust platform for biomarker discovery and validation through the expanded collection of well-annotated biospecimens obtained from clinical trial participants. Thus, publicly funded trials are vital to developing and refining new cancer treatments and disseminating results to the medical community and the general public.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.