Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23363480›Full record

Trial reportTrials2013

Evaluating the effectiveness of reasoning training in military and civilian chronic traumatic brain injury patients: study protocol.

Daniel C Krawczyk, Carlos Marquez de la Plata, Guido F Schauer, Asha K Vas, Molly Keebler, Stephanie Tuthill, Claire Gardner, Tiffani Jantz, Weikei Yu, Sandra B Chapman

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01552473 (Brain Training to Enhance Frontal Lobe Reasoning in Soldiers and Civilian Adults With TBI), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01552473 nacompletednot on this map

Brain Training to Enhance Frontal Lobe Reasoning in Soldiers and Civilian Adults With TBI

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe University of Texas at DallasRan2012 to 2015Enrolled108ConditionsTraumatic Brain InjuryArmsBrain Training Program 1, Brain Training Program 2
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel C KrawczykCenter for BrainHealth®, The University of Texas at Dallas, 2200 Mockingbird Lane, Dallas, TX 75235, USA. daniel.krawczyk@utdallas.edu
Carlos Marquez de la Plata
Guido F Schauer
Asha K Vas
Molly Keebler
Stephanie Tuthill
Claire Gardner
Tiffani Jantz
Weikei Yu
Sandra B Chapman
The University of Texas at Dallas · USUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at Dallas · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndividuals who sustain traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) often continue to experience significant impairment of cognitive functions mediated by the prefrontal cortex well into chronic stages of recovery. Traditional brain training programs that focus on improving specific skills fall short of addressing integrative functions that draw upon multiple higher-order processes critical for social and vocational integration. In the current study, we compare the effects of two short-term, intensive, group-based cognitive rehabilitation programs for individuals with chronic TBI. One program emphasizes learning about brain functions and influences on cognition, while the other program adopts a top-down approach to improve abstract reasoning abilities that are largely reliant on the prefrontal cortex. These treatment programs are evaluated in civilian and military veteran TBI populations. METHODS/

designOne hundred individuals are being enrolled in this double-blinded clinical trial (all measures and data analyses will be conducted by blinded raters and analysts). Each individual is randomly assigned to one of two treatment conditions, with each condition run in groups of five to seven individuals. The primary anticipated outcomes are improvement in abstract reasoning and everyday life functioning, measured through behavioral tasks and questionnaires, and attention modulation, as measured by functional neuroimaging. Secondary expected outcomes include improvements in the cognitive processes of working memory, attention, and inhibitory control. DISCUSSION: Results of this trial will determine whether cognitive rehabilitation aimed at teaching TBI-relevant information about the brain and cognition versus training in TBI-affected thinking abilities (e.g., memory, attention, and executive functioning) can improve outcomes in chronic military and civilian TBI patient populations. It should shed light on the nature of improvements and the characteristics of patients most likely to benefit. This trial will also provide information about the sustainability of treatment-related improvements 3 months post-training.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01552473.

Indexed as

Clinical ProtocolsBrain InjuriesChronic DiseaseCognitionDiffusion Tensor ImagingDouble-Blind MethodHumansLearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingMilitary PersonnelOutcome Assessment, Health Care

Identifiers

PMID23363480
PMCPMC3563488
OpenAlexW2129130559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.