Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23363074›Full record

ArticleNeuropathology and applied neurobiology2013

1p/19q testing has no significance in the workup of glioblastomas.

K H Clark, J L Villano, M N Nikiforova, R L Hamilton, C Horbinski

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropathology and applied neurobiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Molecular Biomarker Testing for the Diagnosis of Diffuse Gliomas.Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine · 2022
    Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. MRI Features Can Predict 1p/19q Status in Intracranial Gliomas.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

K H ClarkDepartment of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
J L Villano
M N Nikiforova
R L Hamilton
C Horbinski
University of Pittsburgh · USUniversity of Kentucky · US

Funding

UNDERSTANDING THE MOLECULAR BASIS OF EPIGENETIC TRANSCRIPTIONAL SILENCINGP20RR020171 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI WHITEHEART, SIDNEY WALDO · 2004 to 2011
$16.5M
The Significance of Isocitrate Dehydrogenase Mutations in GliomasK08CA155764 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI HORBINSKI, CRAIG MICHAEL · 2011 to 2015
$857k
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA155764NCI NIH HHS K08 CA155764-01A1NCRR NIH HHS 2P20 RR020171NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR020171
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo determine whether testing for isolated 1p or 19q losses, or as a codeletion, has any significance in the workup of glioblastomas (GBMs).

methodsUpfront 1p/19q testing by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and/or polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based loss of heterozygosity (LOH) was done in 491 gliomas that were histologically diagnosed as GBMs. Outcomes were determined and measured against 1p/19q results.

resultsTwenty-eight showed apparent 1p/19q codeletion by either FISH and/or PCR-based LOH, but only 1/26 showed codeletion by both tests. Over 90% of tumours with apparent codeletion by either FISH or LOH also had 10q LOH and/or EGFR amplification, features inversely related to true whole-arm 1p/19q codeletion. Furthermore, only 1/28 tumours demonstrated an R132H IDH1 mutation. Neither 1p/19q codeletion by FISH nor LOH had an impact on GBM survival. Isolated losses of 1p or 19q also had no impact on survival.

conclusionsThese data suggest that (i) 1p/19q testing is not useful on gliomas that are histologically GBMs; (ii) codeletion testing should be reserved only for cases with compatible morphology; and (iii) EGFR, 10q, and IDH1 testing can help act as safeguards against a false-positive 1p/19q result.

Indexed as

Chromosome DeletionChromosomes, Human, Pair 1Chromosomes, Human, Pair 19AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBrainBrain NeoplasmsFemaleGenes, NeoplasmGlioblastomaHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adult1p/19qFISHglioblastomaLOH

Identifiers

PMID23363074
PMCPMC4095883
OpenAlexW1903319815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.