Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23362517›Full record

SynthesisAnnals of internal medicine2012

Probiotics for the prevention of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Bradley C Johnston, Stephanie S Y Ma, Joshua Z Goldenberg, Kristian Thorlund, Per O Vandvik, Mark Loeb, Gordon H Guyatt

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Annals of internal medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02046512 (Randomized Controlled Trial of Lactobacillus Rhamnosus GG to Promote Intestinal Health), which is not on this map. Cited by 133 papers, 14 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
133citing papers in PubMed, 14 pooled it
25.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02046512 phase4completednot on this mapstarted 2014, after this paper: background citation

Randomized Controlled Trial of Lactobacillus Rhamnosus GG to Promote Intestinal Health

TypeinterventionalSponsorWashington University School of MedicineRan2014 to 2018Enrolled89ConditionsCommunicable Diseases, Infection, Anti-Infective Agents, Therapeutic UsesArmsProbiotic, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

133 citing papers in PubMed, 14 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 361 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Efficacy ofWorld journal of gastroenterology · 2019
    Pooled it
  9. Guideline
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Trial
  16. Effect of the administration of a probiotic with a combination of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium strains on antibiotic-associated diarrhea.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2019
    Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

73 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Bradley C JohnstonThe Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Room 2420, 555 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X8, Canada. bradley.johnston@sickkids.ca
Stephanie S Y Ma
Joshua Z Goldenberg
Kristian Thorlund
Per O Vandvik
Mark Loeb
Gordon H Guyatt
McMaster University · CAInnlandet Hospital Trust · NOBastyr University · USHospital for Sick Children · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntibiotic treatment may disturb the resistance of gastrointestinal flora to colonization. This may result in complications, the most serious of which is Clostridium difficile–associated diarrhea (CDAD). PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy and safety of probiotics for the prevention of CDAD in adults and children receiving antibiotics. DATA SOURCES: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, Web of Science, and 12 gray-literature sources. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized, controlled trials including adult or pediatric patients receiving antibiotics that compared any strain or dose of a specified probiotic with placebo or with no treatment control and reported the incidence of CDAD. DATA EXTRACTION: Two reviewers independently screened potentially eligible articles; extracted data on populations, interventions, and outcomes; and assessed risk of bias. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation guidelines were used to independently rate overall confidence in effect estimates for each outcome. DATA SYNTHESIS: Twenty trials including 3818 participants met the eligibility criteria. Probiotics reduced the incidence of CDAD by 66% (pooled relative risk, 0.34 [95% CI, 0.24 to 0.49]; I(2) = 0%). In a population with a 5% incidence of antibiotic-associated CDAD (median control group risk), probiotic prophylaxis would prevent 33 episodes (CI, 25 to 38 episodes) per 1000 persons. Of probiotic-treated patients, 9.3% experienced adverse events, compared with 12.6% of control patients (relative risk, 0.82 [CI, 0.65 to 1.05]; I(2) = 17%). LIMITATIONS: In 13 trials, data on CDAD were missing for 5% to 45% of patients. The results were robust to worst-plausible assumptions regarding event rates in studies with missing outcome data.

conclusionModerate-quality evidence suggests that probiotic prophylaxis results in a large reduction in CDAD without an increase in clinically important adverse events. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: None.

Indexed as

Clostridioides difficileAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsChildDiarrheaEnterocolitis, PseudomembranousGastrointestinal TractHumansIncidenceProbioticsRisk FactorsAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID23362517
OpenAlexW2088092352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.