SynthesisAnnals of internal medicine2012
Probiotics for the prevention of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Annals of internal medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02046512 (Randomized Controlled Trial of Lactobacillus Rhamnosus GG to Promote Intestinal Health), which is not on this map. Cited by 133 papers, 14 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Randomized Controlled Trial of Lactobacillus Rhamnosus GG to Promote Intestinal Health
Who cites it
133 citing papers in PubMed, 14 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 361 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy of probiotic supplementation in preventingFrontiers in nutrition · 2026Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Early use of probiotics might prevent antibiotic-associated diarrhea in elderly (>65 years): a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC geriatrics · 2022Pooled it
- Probiotics for preventing or treating COVID-19; a systematic review of research evidence and meta-analyses of efficacy for preventing death, severe disease, or disease progression.Wellcome open research · 2022Pooled it
- Probiotics for the Prevention of Antibiotic-associated Diarrhea in Adults: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trials.Journal of clinical gastroenterology · 2021Pooled it
- Efficacy of Single-Strain Probiotics Versus Multi-Strain Mixtures: Systematic Review of Strain and Disease Specificity.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2021Pooled it
- Effects of a Fermented Dairy Drink ContainingNutrients · 2020Pooled it
- Efficacy ofWorld journal of gastroenterology · 2019Pooled it
- A practical guide for probiotics applied to the case of antibiotic-associated diarrhea in The Netherlands.BMC gastroenterology · 2018Guideline
- Clostridium Difficile Infection in Acute Care Hospitals: Systematic Review and Best Practices for Prevention.Infection control and hospital epidemiology · 2017Pooled it
- Probiotics for prevention of radiation-induced diarrhea: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.PloS one · 2017Pooled it
- Efficacy of Electrical Stimulators for Bone Healing: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Sham-Controlled Trials.Scientific reports · 2016Pooled it
- Comparison of pediatric and adult antibiotic-associated diarrhea and Clostridium difficile infections.World journal of gastroenterology · 2016Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of Saccharomyces boulardii as adjunct therapy with Vancomycin in treating Clostridioides difficile infection: A randomized controlled trial.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- Effect of the administration of a probiotic with a combination of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium strains on antibiotic-associated diarrhea.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2019Trial
- The impact of probiotic supplementation during pregnancy on DNA methylation of obesity-related genes in mothers and their children.European journal of nutrition · 2019Trial
- A prospective, interventional, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Bacillus coagulans LBSC in the treatment of acute diarrhea with abdominal discomfort.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2019Trial
- The beneficial effects of Lactobacillus reuteri ADR-1 or ADR-3 consumption on type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial.Scientific reports · 2018Trial
- The Role of Probiotics in the Treatment of Dysentery: a Randomized Double-Blind Clinical Trial.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2017Trial
73 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by[Not Available].2013
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAntibiotic treatment may disturb the resistance of gastrointestinal flora to colonization. This may result in complications, the most serious of which is Clostridium difficile–associated diarrhea (CDAD). PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy and safety of probiotics for the prevention of CDAD in adults and children receiving antibiotics. DATA SOURCES: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, Web of Science, and 12 gray-literature sources. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized, controlled trials including adult or pediatric patients receiving antibiotics that compared any strain or dose of a specified probiotic with placebo or with no treatment control and reported the incidence of CDAD. DATA EXTRACTION: Two reviewers independently screened potentially eligible articles; extracted data on populations, interventions, and outcomes; and assessed risk of bias. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation guidelines were used to independently rate overall confidence in effect estimates for each outcome. DATA SYNTHESIS: Twenty trials including 3818 participants met the eligibility criteria. Probiotics reduced the incidence of CDAD by 66% (pooled relative risk, 0.34 [95% CI, 0.24 to 0.49]; I(2) = 0%). In a population with a 5% incidence of antibiotic-associated CDAD (median control group risk), probiotic prophylaxis would prevent 33 episodes (CI, 25 to 38 episodes) per 1000 persons. Of probiotic-treated patients, 9.3% experienced adverse events, compared with 12.6% of control patients (relative risk, 0.82 [CI, 0.65 to 1.05]; I(2) = 17%). LIMITATIONS: In 13 trials, data on CDAD were missing for 5% to 45% of patients. The results were robust to worst-plausible assumptions regarding event rates in studies with missing outcome data.
conclusionModerate-quality evidence suggests that probiotic prophylaxis results in a large reduction in CDAD without an increase in clinically important adverse events. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: None.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.