Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23361391›Full record

Trial reportJournal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism2013

Ultrasonographic markers of vascular risk in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis.

Mauro Silvestrini, Claudia Altamura, Raffaella Cerqua, Patrizio Pasqualetti, Giovanna Viticchi, Leandro Provinciali, Luca Paulon, Fabrizio Vernieri

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Functional Assessment of Intermediate Vascular Disease.BioMed research international · 2018
    Review
  13. Carotid Artery Stenosis: Medical Therapy, Surgery, and Stenting.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2017
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Sex-associated differences in the modulation of vascular risk in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2015
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mauro SilvestriniNeurological Clinic, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona, Italy. m.silvestrini@univpm.it
Claudia Altamura
Raffaella Cerqua
Patrizio Pasqualetti
Giovanna Viticchi
Leandro Provinciali
Luca Paulon
Fabrizio Vernieri
Marche Polytechnic University · ITFatebenefratelli Hospital · ITUniversità Campus Bio-Medico · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Six-hundred twenty-one subjects with unilateral asymptomatic severe internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis were prospectively evaluated with a median follow-up of 27 months (min=6, max=68). Vascular risk profile, plaque characteristic, stenosis progression, and common carotid artery intima-media thickness (IMT) were investigated in all patients. Outcome measures were occurrence of ischemic stroke ipsilateral to ICA stenosis and vascular death, while myocardial infarction, contralateral strokes, and transient ischemic attack were considered as competing events. A total of 99 subjects (15.9%) suffered from a vascular event. Among them, 39 were strokes ipsilateral to the stenosis (6.3%). Degree of stenosis, stenosis progression, and common carotid artery IMT resulted as independent predictive factors of ipsilateral stroke. Considering a stenosis of 60% to 70% as reference, a degree between 71% and 90% increased the risk by 2.45, while a degree between 91% and 99% increased the risk by 3.26. The progression of stenosis was a strong risk factor (hazard ratio=4.32). Finally, the role of carotid IMT was confirmed as crucial additional measure, with an increased risk by 25% for each 0.1 mm IMT increase. Our data suggest that IMT, stenosis progression and severity should be considered as risk factors for cerebrovascular events in asymptomatic subjects with severe ICA stenosis.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overBrain IschemiaCarotid Artery, CommonCarotid StenosisFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsStrokeTunica IntimaUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID23361391
PMCPMC3618401
OpenAlexW2062658210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.