Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23360956›Full record

ArticlePharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior2013

Early ontogeny of D-amphetamine-induced one-trial behavioral sensitization.

Sanders A McDougall, Charlotte M Nuqui, Anthony T Quiroz, Carrissa M Martinez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sanders A McDougallDepartment of Psychology, 5500 University Parkway, California State University, San Bernardino, CA 92407, USA. smcdouga@csusb.edu
Charlotte M Nuqui
Anthony T Quiroz
Carrissa M Martinez

Funding

CSU San Bernardino Minority Access to Research CareersT34GM083883 · NIGMS · CALIFORNIA STATE UNIV SAN BERNARDINO · PI MCDOUGALL, SANDERS · 2009 to 2019
$3.0M
Ontogeny of behavioral sensitization: associative and nonassociative processesSC1DA027985 · NIDA · CALIFORNIA STATE UNIV SAN BERNARDINO · PI MCDOUGALL, SANDERS · 2009 to 2012
$1.0M
NIDA NIH HHS DA027985NIDA NIH HHS SC1 DA027985NIGMS NIH HHS GM083883NIGMS NIH HHS T34 GM083883
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The early ontogeny of D-amphetamine-induced one-trial behavioral sensitization was characterized using male and female preweanling and preadolescent rats. In Experiment 1, rats were injected with saline or D-amphetamine (1, 4, or 8mg/kg) in activity chambers or the home cage on postnatal day (PD) 12, PD 16, PD 20, or PD 24. One day later, rats were challenged with either 0.5 or 2mg/kg D-amphetamine and distance traveled was measured in activity chambers for 120min. In Experiment 2, saline or D-amphetamine was administered in activity chambers on PD 24, while a challenge injection of D-amphetamine (0.25-4mg/kg) was given on PD 25. At younger ages (PD 13 and PD 17), a strong sensitized response was evident on the test day regardless of whether rats were pretreated with D-amphetamine (4 or 8mg/kg) before being placed in the activity chamber or 30min after being returned to the home cage. Rats did not display D-amphetamine-induced behavioral sensitization on PD 21, nor was context-dependent sensitization apparent on PD 25 even when a broad dose range of D-amphetamine was used. When low doses of D-amphetamine were administered on the pretreatment and test days (1 and 0.5mg/kg, respectively), sensitized responding was not evident at any age. In summary, D-amphetamine-induced one-trial behavioral sensitization was only apparent within a narrow developmental window during early ontogeny. This ontogenetic pattern of sensitized responding is similar to the one produced by methamphetamine and distinct from the pattern produced by cocaine. The unique sensitization profiles resulting from repeated D-amphetamine and cocaine treatment may be a consequence of their different mechanisms of action.

Indexed as

Age FactorsAnimalsBehavior, AnimalBrainCentral Nervous System StimulantsCocaineDextroamphetamineDopamine Uptake InhibitorsFemaleMaleMotor ActivityRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyCentral Nervous System StimulantsCocaineDextroamphetamineDopamine Uptake Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID23360956
PMCPMC3594533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.