ArticleBMC research notes2013
Quality assessment metrics for whole genome gene expression profiling of paraffin embedded samples.
Article in BMC research notes, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bevacizumab May Differentially Improve Ovarian Cancer Outcome in Patients with Proliferative and Mesenchymal Molecular Subtypes.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2017Trial
- A microRNA Transcriptome-wide Association Study of Prostate Cancer Risk.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Characteristics and Spatially Defined Immune (micro)landscapes of Early-stage PD-L1-positive Triple-negative Breast Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2021Article
- Identification of unique venous thromboembolism-susceptibility variants in African-Americans.Thrombosis and haemostasis · 2017Article
- Article
- Genes associated with histopathologic features of triple negative breast tumors predict molecular subtypes.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2016Article
- Gene signature model for breast cancer risk prediction for women with sclerosing adenosis.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2015Article
- Genetic variation in mitotic regulatory pathway genes is associated with breast tumor grade.Human molecular genetics · 2014Article
- Genome-wide association study identifies 25 known breast cancer susceptibility loci as risk factors for triple-negative breast cancer.Carcinogenesis · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFormalin fixed, paraffin embedded tissues are most commonly used for routine pathology analysis and for long term tissue preservation in the clinical setting. Many institutions have large archives of Formalin fixed, paraffin embedded tissues that provide a unique opportunity for understanding genomic signatures of disease. However, genome-wide expression profiling of Formalin fixed, paraffin embedded samples have been challenging due to RNA degradation. Because of the significant heterogeneity in tissue quality, normalization and analysis of these data presents particular challenges. The distribution of intensity values from archival tissues are inherently noisy and skewed due to differential sample degradation raising two primary concerns; whether a highly skewed array will unduly influence initial normalization of the data and whether outlier arrays can be reliably identified.
findingsTwo simple extensions of common regression diagnostic measures are introduced that measure the stress an array undergoes during normalization and how much a given array deviates from the remaining arrays post-normalization. These metrics are applied to a study involving 1618 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded HER2-positive breast cancer samples from the N9831 adjuvant trial processed with Illumina's cDNA-mediated Annealing Selection extension and Ligation assay.
conclusionProper assessment of array quality within a research study is crucial for controlling unwanted variability in the data. The metrics proposed in this paper have direct biological interpretations and can be used to identify arrays that should either be removed from analysis all together or down-weighted to reduce their influence in downstream analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.