Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23360695›Full record

Trial reportPublic health nutrition2014

Effect of nutrition education intervention based on Pender's Health Promotion Model in improving the frequency and nutrient intake of breakfast consumption among female Iranian students.

Tahereh Dehdari, Tahereh Rahimi, Naheed Aryaeian, Mahmood Reza Gohari

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Public health nutrition, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Can Social Cognitive Theory Influence Breakfast Frequency in an Institutional Context: A Qualitative Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The "Motor of the Day": Parent and School-Age Children's Cognitions, Barriers, and Supports for Breakfast.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tahereh Dehdari1 Department of Health Education and Health Promotion, School of Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran, PO Box 15875-4199.
Tahereh Rahimi1 Department of Health Education and Health Promotion, School of Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran, PO Box 15875-4199.
Naheed Aryaeian2 Department of Nutrition, School of Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran.
Mahmood Reza Gohari3 Department of Mathematics & Statistics, Hospital Management Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the effectiveness of nutrition education intervention based on Pender's Health Promotion Model in improving the frequency and nutrient intake of breakfast consumption among female Iranian students.

designThe quasi-experimental study based on Pender's Health Promotion Model was conducted during April-June 2011. Information (data) was collected by self-administered questionnaire. In addition, a 3 d breakfast record was analysed. P < 0·05 was considered significant.

settingTwo middle schools in average-income areas of Qom, Iran. SUBJECTS: One hundred female middle-school students.

resultsThere was a significant reduction in immediate competing demands and preferences, perceived barriers and negative activity-related affect constructs in the experimental group after education compared with the control group. In addition, perceived benefit, perceived self-efficacy, positive activity-related affect, interpersonal influences, situational influences, commitment to a plan of action, frequency and intakes of macronutrients and most micronutrients of breakfast consumption were also significantly higher in the experimental group compared with the control group after the nutrition education intervention.

conclusionsConstructs of Pender's Health Promotion Model provide a suitable source for designing strategies and content of a nutrition education intervention for improving the frequency and nutrient intake of breakfast consumption among female students.

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorAchievementAdolescentBreakfastCognitionEnergy IntakeFamily CharacteristicsFamily RelationsFemaleHealth PromotionHumansIranModels, StatisticalNutritional SciencesNutritional StatusProgram Evaluation

Identifiers

PMID23360695
PMCPMC10282240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.