ArticleScientific reports2013
A reinvestigation of the reference frame of the tilt-adaptation aftereffect.
Article in Scientific reports, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed.
- Top-down motivation both decreases and increases feature interference following a saccade.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2026Article
- The influence of saccade target status on the reference frame of object-location binding.Journal of experimental psychology. General · 2025Article
- Article
- Visual influence on bimanual haptic slant adaptation.Journal of vision · 2024Article
- The spatial properties of adaptation-induced distance compression.Journal of vision · 2022Article
- Visual Remapping.Annual review of vision science · 2021Review
- A review of interactions between peripheral and foveal vision.Journal of vision · 2020Review
- Article
- Parallel Adaptation to Spatially Distinct Distortions.Frontiers in psychology · 2020Article
- Remapping locations and features across saccades: a dual-spotlight theory of attentional updating.Current opinion in psychology · 2019Review
- Time course of spatiotopic updating across saccades.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019Article
- Sensory and decision-making processes underlying perceptual adaptation.Journal of vision · 2018Article
- Neural Hyperexcitability in Autism Spectrum Disorders.Brain sciences · 2017Review
- The reference frame of the tilt aftereffect measured by differential Pavlovian conditioning.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Corollary Discharge and Oculomotor Proprioception: Cortical Mechanisms for Spatially Accurate Vision.Annual review of vision science · 2016Review
- Presaccadic motion integration between current and future retinotopic locations of attended objects.Journal of neurophysiology · 2016Article
- Spatiotopic updating facilitates perception immediately after saccades.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- The relationship between visual attention and visual working memory encoding: A dissociation between covert and overt orienting.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance · 2016Article
- Reference Frames and 3-D Shape Perception of Pictured Objects: On Verticality and Viewpoint-From-Above.i-Perception · 2016Article
- Perisaccadic Updating of Visual Representations and Attentional States: Linking Behavior and Neurophysiology.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The tilt-adaptation aftereffect (TAE) is the phenomenon that prolonged perception of a tilted 'adapter' stimulus affects the perceived tilt of a subsequent 'tester' stimulus. Although it is clear that TAE is strongest when adapter and tester are presented at the same location, the reference frame of the effect is debated. Some authors have reported that TAE is spatiotopic (world centred): It occurs when adapter and tester are presented at the same display location, even when this corresponds to different retinal locations. Others have reported that TAE is exclusively retinotopic (eye centred): It occurs only when adapter and tester are presented at the same retinal location, even when this corresponds to different display locations. Because this issue is crucial for models of transsaccadic perception, we reinvestigated the reference frame of TAE. We report that TAE is exclusively retinotopic, supporting the notion that there is no transsaccadic integration of low-level visual information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.