Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23359804›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Molecular markers in sex hormone pathway genes associated with the efficacy of androgen-deprivation therapy for prostate cancer.

Chia-Cheng Yu, Shu-Pin Huang, Yung-Chin Lee, Chao-Yuan Huang, Chia-Chu Liu, Tzyh-Chyuan Hour, Chun-Nung Huang, Bang-Jau You, Ta-Yuan Chang, Chun-Hsiung Huang and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Prognostic Significance ofCancer genomics & proteomics · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Prostate Cancer: Is It a Battle Lost to Age?Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2016
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Genetic variation: effect on prostate cancer.Biochimica et biophysica acta · 2014
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Chia-Cheng YuDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Shu-Pin Huang
Yung-Chin Lee
Chao-Yuan Huang
Chia-Chu Liu
Tzyh-Chyuan Hour
Chun-Nung Huang
Bang-Jau You
Ta-Yuan Chang
Chun-Hsiung Huang
Bo-Ying Bao

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although most advanced prostate cancer patients respond to androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT), the efficacy is widely variable. We investigated whether the host genetic variations in sex hormone pathway genes are associated with the efficacy of ADT. A cohort of 645 patients with advanced prostate cancer treated with ADT was genotyped for 18 polymorphisms across 12 key genes involved in androgen and estrogen metabolism. We found that after adjusting for known risk factors in multivariate Cox regression models, AKR1C3 rs12529 and AR-CAG repeat length remained significantly associated with prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) after ADT (P ≤ 0.041). Furthermore, individuals carrying two unfavorable genotypes at these loci presented a 13.7-fold increased risk of PCSM compared with individuals carrying zero (P<0.001). Our results identify two candidate molecular markers in key genes of androgen and estrogen pathways associated with PCSM after ADT, establishing the role of pharmacogenomics in this therapy.

Indexed as

Genetic MarkersAgedAndrogen AntagonistsGonadal Steroid HormonesHumansMaleMultivariate AnalysisPolymorphism, Single NucleotideProstatic NeoplasmsRisk FactorsAndrogen AntagonistsGenetic MarkersGonadal Steroid Hormones

Identifiers

PMID23359804
PMCPMC3554749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.