Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23359217›Full record

ReviewJournal of autism and developmental disorders2013

Changing concepts and findings on autism.

Michael Rutter

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Genetic Advances in Autism.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2021
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Functional testing of ASD-associated genes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Integrating care for neurodevelopmental disorders by unpacking control: A grounded theory study.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2016
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Michael RutterMRC Social Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre (SGDP), Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8AF, UK. camilla.azis@kcl.ac.uk

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New research findings provide major challenges regarding our understanding of the concept of autism. These are critically discussed in relation to research relevant to classification, genetics, environmental risk factors, gene-environment interplay, animal models, biomarkers, clinical features, neuropathology, pharmacotherapy, behavioral treatments, and functioning in adult life. It is concluded that, although there have been major research advances; there is a need for a reconceptualization and an avoidance of claims that go beyond the evidence.

Indexed as

Autistic DisorderAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalHumans

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.