ArticleMolecular biotechnology2013
Anti-digoxin Fab variants generated by phage display.
Article in Molecular biotechnology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Digoxin is a pharmaceutical used in the control of cardiac dysfunction. Its therapeutic window is narrow, with effect dosage very close to the toxic dosage. To counteract the toxic effect, polyclonal Fab fragments are commercially available. Our study is based on a monoclonal anti-digoxin antibody, which would provide a product with a specific potency and more precise dosage for the detoxification of patients under digoxin treatment. Phage display technology was used to select variants with high affinity. From an anti-digoxin hybridoma, RNA was extracted for subsequent cDNA synthesis. Specific primers were used for the LC and Fd amplifications, then cloned sequentially in a phagemid vector (pComb3X) for the combinatorial Fab library construction. Clones were selected for their ability to bind to digoxin-BSA. The presence of light and heavy chains was checked, randomly selected clones then sequenced and induced to produce soluble Fabs, and subsequently analyzed for anti-digoxin expression. Out of ten clones randomly chosen, six resulted positive expression of the product. The sequencing of these revealed two identical clones and one presenting a pseudogene in the LC. Four clones presenting variations in the framework1 showed binding to digoxin-BSA by ELISA and western blotting. The specific binding was further confirmed by Biacore(®), which allowed ranking of the clones. The development of these clones allowed the selection of variants with higher affinity than the original version.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.