Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23359065›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2013

Influence of myocardial region of interest definition on quantitative analysis of planar 123I-mIBG images.

Arnold F Jacobson, Dale T Matsuoka

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Influence of ROI definition on the heart-to-mediastinum ratio in planarJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2018
    Article
  2. ASNC imaging guidelines for SPECT nuclear cardiology procedures: Stress, protocols, and tracers.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2016
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Quantification of I-123-meta-iodobenzylguanidine heart-to-mediastinum ratios: not so simple after all.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2014
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Arnold F JacobsonMedical Diagnostics, GE Healthcare, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA. arnold.jacobson@ge.com
Dale T Matsuoka

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn planar (123)I-mIBG myocardial imaging, definition of the heart region of interest (ROI) is a critical step in quantifying uptake. The present study evaluated the impact of changes in heart ROI size on quantitative results in subjects with good and poor uptake.

methodsReference irregular whole-heart and square upper mediastinum ROIs were defined visually on 531 planar (123)I-mIBG images. Based on the reference heart ROI, an automated program created two other ROIs: one larger (+1 pixel) and one smaller (-1 pixel), the stated numbers representing the spacing intervals between each epicardial boundary pixel. Two additional smaller ROIs (-2 and -3 pixels) were drawn for the 100 images (19 %) with a heart/mediastinum (H/M) ratio ≤1.30. The number of pixels, the counts per pixel, and the H/M ratio for each heart ROI were calculated and compared to that in the reference ROI. Washout rate and changes as a function of ROI size were also calculated for 110 subjects who had both early and late images.

resultsThe mean changes in heart ROI size ranged from +19.0 % for the +1 pixel to -44.4 % for the -3 pixels ROI. For the +1 and -1 pixel ROIs, mean relative counts per pixel changes were -1.2 % and +0.7 %, respectively, with corresponding ranges of change in the H/M ratio of -0.12 to +0.05 and -0.05 to +0.11. For scans with H/M ratio ≤1.30, mean relative counts per pixel changes were 0, 0, -0.7 %, and -1.4 % for the four ROIs, with range of change in the H/M ratio from -0.13 to +0.05. Mean washout rates were almost identical for the reference ROIs (45.0 %) and the +1 pixel and -1 pixel heart ROIs (44.9 % and 45.1 %, respectively).

conclusionSignificant changes in the size of the best visually defined heart ROI produce minimal, clinically inconsequential changes in the H/M ratio and washout rate, even in subjects with significantly reduced myocardial uptake of (123)I-mIBG.

Indexed as

3-IodobenzylguanidineCase-Control StudiesData Interpretation, StatisticalHeartHumansMediastinumMyocardial Perfusion ImagingRadiopharmaceuticalsReference Values3-IodobenzylguanidineRadiopharmaceuticals

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.