ArticlePlant molecular biology2013
Charge versus sequence for nuclear/nucleolar localization of plant ribosomal proteins.
Article in Plant molecular biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nucleolar beacon for monitoring nucleolar morphology and proteomics in living cells.Science advances · 2025Article
- Non-Canonical Localization of Cardiac Troponins: Expanding Functions or Causing Pathologies?International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Nucleolar targeting in an early-branching eukaryote suggests a general mechanism for ribosome protein sorting.Journal of cell science · 2022Article
- Molecular Coevolution of Nuclear and Nucleolar Localization Signals inside the Basic Domain of HIV-1 Tat.Journal of virology · 2022Article
- Phase separation of a plant virus movement protein and cellular factors support virus-host interactions.PLoS pathogens · 2021Article
- Endomembrane-TargetingFrontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- Arabidopsis paralogous genes RPL23aA and RPL23aB encode functionally equivalent proteins.BMC plant biology · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ribosomal subunit assembly in the nucleolus is dependent on efficient targeting of ribosomal proteins (RPs) from the cytoplasm into the nucleus and nucleolus. Nuclear/nucleolar localization of a protein is generally mediated by one or more specific stretches of basic amino acids-nuclear/nucleolar localization signals (NLSs/NoLSs). Arabidopsis thaliana RPL23aA has eight putative NLSs/NoLSs (pNLSs/NoLSs). Here we mutated all eight NLS/NoLSs individually and in groups and showed, via transient expression in tobacco cells that nucleolar localization of RPL23aA was disrupted by mutation of various combinations of five or more pNLSs/NoLSs. Mutation of all eight pNLSs/NoLSs, a 50 % reduction in total basic charge of RPL23aA, resulted in a complete disruption of nucleolar localization, however, the protein can still localize to the nucleus. As no individual or specific combination of NoLSs was absolutely required for nucleolar localization, we suggest that nucleolar localization/retention of RPL23aA is dependent on the overall basic charge. In addition to the optimal basic charge conferred by these NoLSs, nucleolar localization/retention of RPL23aA also required a C-terminal putative 26S rRNA binding site. In contrast, in the RPs RPS8A and RPL15A, mutation of just two and three N-terminal pNLSs, respectively, disrupted both nuclear and nucleolar localization of these two RPs, indicating differential signal requirements for nuclear and nucleolar localization of the three Arabidopsis RPs RPL23aA, RPL15A and RPS8A.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.