SynthesisJAMA pediatrics2013
Pharmacologic treatment of pediatric headaches: a meta-analysis.
Synthesis in JAMA pediatrics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
40 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 104 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy, Safety, and Acceptability of Pharmacologic Treatments for Pediatric Migraine Prophylaxis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.JAMA pediatrics · 2020Pooled it
- The Efficacy and Safety of Topiramate in the Prevention of Pediatric Migraine: An Update Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2020Pooled it
- Migraine headache in children.BMJ clinical evidence · 2015Pooled it
- Placebo Responses in Genetically Determined Intellectual Disability: A Meta-Analysis.PloS one · 2015Pooled it
- Effect of Propranolol Prophylaxis on Headache Frequency in Children with Migraine Without Aura: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2023Trial
- A Randomized Trial to Evaluate OnabotulinumtoxinA for Prevention of Headaches in Adolescents With Chronic Migraine.Headache · 2020Trial
- Trial of Amitriptyline, Topiramate, and Placebo for Pediatric Migraine.The New England journal of medicine · 2017Trial
- Trial
- Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics, Efficacy and Safety of Fremanezumab in Children and Adolescents with Migraine.European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics · 2026Review
- Preventive Medications in Pediatric Migraine: A Network Meta-Analysis.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Effectiveness and Tolerability of Anti-Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Therapy for Migraine and Other Chronic Headaches in Adolescents and Young Adults: A Retrospective Study in the USA.Brain sciences · 2024Article
- Managing migraine on the frontline: Identifying disease, understanding burden, and incorporating CGRP pathway-targeting therapies in primary care.British journal of pain · 2022Article
- Emerging Pharmacological Treatments for Migraine in the Pediatric Population.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Prognosis of headache in children: a 25-year follow-up.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2022Article
- Pediatric Headache in Primary Care and Emergency Departments: Consensus with RAND/UCLA Method.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Management of Chronic Migraine in Children and Adolescents: Where are We in 2022?Pediatric health, medicine and therapeutics · 2022Review
- Prevalence of Headache Days and Disability 3 Years After Participation in the Childhood and Adolescent Migraine Prevention Medication Trial.JAMA network open · 2021Article
- Article
- An observational study of fixed-dose Tanacetum parthenium nutraceutical preparation for prophylaxis of pediatric headache.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2019Observational
- Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the effectiveness of prophylactic headache treatment in children and adolescents. DATA SOURCES PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Clinical Trials, and bibliography of retrieved articles through August 11, 2012. STUDY SELECTION Randomized trials of headache treatment among children and adolescents (<18 years old). INTERVENTION Any placebo-controlled trial or comparisons between 2 or more active medications. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Number of headaches per month. RESULTS Among 21 included trials, there were 13 placebo-controlled and 10 active comparator trials (2 also included placebo). Twenty trials focused on episodic migraines and 1 on chronic daily headaches. Drugs more effective than placebo for episodic migraines (<15 headaches per month) included topiramate (difference in headaches per month, -0.71; 95% CI, -1.19 to -0.24) and trazodone (-0.60; 95% CI, -1.09 to -0.11). Ineffective drugs included clonidine, flunarizine, pizotifen, propranolol, and valproate. A single trial of fluoxetine for chronic daily headaches found it ineffective. Patients given placebo experienced a significant (P = .03) decline in headaches, from 5.6 (95% CI, 4.52-6.77; Q = 8.14 [Cochran Q is a measure of the heterogeneity of the included studies]) to 2.9 headaches per month (95% CI, 1.66-4.08; Q = 4.72). Among the 10 active comparator trials, flunarizine was more effective than piracetam (difference in headaches per month, -2.20; 95% CI, -3.93 to -0.47) but no better than aspirin, dihydroergotamine, or propranolol. Propranolol was compared with valproate as well as behavioral treatment, and 2 studies compared different doses of topiramate; none of these trials showed significant differences. CONCLUSIONS Topiramate and trazodone have limited evidence supporting efficacy for episodic migraines. Placebo was effective in reducing headaches. Other commonly used drugs have no evidence supporting their use in children and adolescents. More research is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.