Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23358873›Full record

ReviewBiomedical microdevices2013

Microfluidics and cancer: are we there yet?

Zhuo Zhang, Sunitha Nagrath

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedical microdevices, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. 3D Breast Cancer Model on Silk Fibroin-Integrated Microfluidic Chips.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Lab-on-a-Chip Devices for Point-of-Care Medical Diagnostics.Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  13. Frontiers in medicine · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. 3D Cell Culture Systems: Tumor Application, Advantages, and Disadvantages.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zhuo ZhangDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, 2300 Hayward Street, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Sunitha NagrathDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, 2300 Hayward Street, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA. snagrath@umich.edu.

Funding

Engineering sensitive microfluidic multiplex technology for isolating circulatingDP2OD006672 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI NAGRATH, SUNITHA · 2009 to 2009
$2.1M
NIH HHS 1DP2 OD006672-01NIH HHS DP2 OD006672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

More than two decades ago, microfluidics began to show its impact in biological research. Since then, the field of microfluidics has evolving rapidly. Cancer is one of the leading causes of death worldwide. Microfluidics holds great promise in cancer diagnosis and also serves as an emerging tool for understanding cancer biology. Microfluidics can be valuable for cancer investigation due to its high sensitivity, high throughput, less material-consumption, low cost, and enhanced spatio-temporal control. The physical laws on microscale offer an advantage enabling the control of physics, biology, chemistry and physiology at cellular level. Furthermore, microfluidic based platforms are portable and can be easily designed for point-of-care diagnostics. Developing and applying the state of the art microfluidic technologies to address the unmet challenges in cancer can expand the horizons of not only fundamental biology but also the management of disease and patient care. Despite the various microfluidic technologies available in the field, few have been tested clinically, which can be attributed to the various challenges existing in bridging the gap between the emerging technology and real world applications. We present a review of role of microfluidics in cancer research, including the history, recent advances and future directions to explore where the field stand currently in addressing complex clinical challenges and future of it. This review identifies four critical areas in cancer research, in which microfluidics can change the current paradigm. These include cancer cell isolation, molecular diagnostics, tumor biology and high-throughput screening for therapeutics. In addition, some of our lab's current research is presented in the corresponding sections.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsCell SeparationDrug Screening Assays, AntitumorMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesNeoplastic Cells, Circulating

Identifiers

PMID23358873
PMCPMC4017600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.