Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23358228›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2013

A hybrid likelihood model for sequence-based disease association studies.

Yun-Ching Chen, Hannah Carter, Jennifer Parla, Melissa Kramer, Fernando S Goes, Mehdi Pirooznia, Peter P Zandi, W Richard McCombie, James B Potash, Rachel Karchin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Mutations in the pancreatic secretory enzymesProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Endoplasmic stress-inducing variants in carboxyl ester lipase and pancreatic cancer risk.Pancreatology : official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) ... [et al.] · 2022
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. [Genetics of bipolar disorder].Der Nervenarzt · 2017
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yun-Ching ChenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Institute for Computational Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Hannah Carter
Jennifer Parla
Melissa Kramer
Fernando S Goes
Mehdi Pirooznia
Peter P Zandi
W Richard McCombie
James B Potash
Rachel Karchin
Johns Hopkins University · USCold Spring Harbor Laboratory · USUniversity of Iowa · US

Funding

UT Southwestern Center for Translational Medicine (UL1/KL2/TL1)UL1TR001105 · NCATS · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI TOTO, ROBERT DANIEL · 2013 to 2017
$24.5M
UT-Southwestern Clinical and Translational Alliance for Research (UT-STAR) (TL1)UL1TR000451 · NCATS · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI TOTO, ROBERT DANIEL · 2012 to 2012
$6.3M
2/2-Rare Bipolar Loci Identification Through Synaptome Sequencing.R01MH087992 · NIMH · COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY · PI MCCOMBIE, WILLIAM RICHARD · 2010 to 2014
$3.9M
1/2 Rare Bipolar Loci identification through Synaptome SequencingR01MH087979 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI POTASH, JAMES B. · 2010 to 2014
$2.0M
Novel Analytic Methods for Rare Variant Detection in Bipolar DisorderK01MH093809 · NIMH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI PIROOZNIA, MEHDI · 2011 to 2015
$886k
Genomewide Association & High-Throughput Sequencing of Psychotic Bipolar DisorderR00MH086049 · NIMH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GOES, FERNANDO SAMPAIO · 2012 to 2014
$733k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000451NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001105NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH093809NIMH NIH HHS K01MH093809NIMH NIH HHS R00 MH086049NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH087979NIMH NIH HHS R01MH087979NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH087992NIMH NIH HHS R01MH087992
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the past few years, case-control studies of common diseases have shifted their focus from single genes to whole exomes. New sequencing technologies now routinely detect hundreds of thousands of sequence variants in a single study, many of which are rare or even novel. The limitation of classical single-marker association analysis for rare variants has been a challenge in such studies. A new generation of statistical methods for case-control association studies has been developed to meet this challenge. A common approach to association analysis of rare variants is the burden-style collapsing methods to combine rare variant data within individuals across or within genes. Here, we propose a new hybrid likelihood model that combines a burden test with a test of the position distribution of variants. In extensive simulations and on empirical data from the Dallas Heart Study, the new model demonstrates consistently good power, in particular when applied to a gene set (e.g., multiple candidate genes with shared biological function or pathway), when rare variants cluster in key functional regions of a gene, and when protective variants are present. When applied to data from an ongoing sequencing study of bipolar disorder (191 cases, 107 controls), the model identifies seven gene sets with nominal p-values < 0.05, of which one MAPK signaling pathway (KEGG) reaches trend-level significance after correcting for multiple testing.

Indexed as

Genetic Association StudiesMitogen-Activated Protein Kinase KinasesModels, GeneticCase-Control StudiesComputer SimulationExomeGenome, HumanHumansLikelihood FunctionsModels, TheoreticalPolymorphism, Single NucleotideProbabilitySignal TransductionMitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Kinases

Identifiers

PMID23358228
PMCPMC3554549
OpenAlexW2002012019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.