Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23357980›Full record

Trial reportClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2013

Overcoming the response plateau in multiple myeloma: a novel bortezomib-based strategy for secondary induction and high-yield CD34+ stem cell mobilization.

Ruben Niesvizky, Tomer M Mark, Maureen Ward, David S Jayabalan, Roger N Pearse, Megan Manco, Jessica Stern, Paul J Christos, Lena Mathews, Tsiporah B Shore and 8 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Response-Adapted Therapy for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2023
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ruben NiesvizkyCenter of Excellence for Lymphoma and Myeloma, Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Weill Cornell Medical College and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York 10021, USA. run9001@med.cornell.edu
Tomer M Mark
Maureen Ward
David S Jayabalan
Roger N Pearse
Megan Manco
Jessica Stern
Paul J Christos
Lena Mathews
Tsiporah B Shore
Faiza Zafar
Karen Pekle
Zhaoying Xiang
Scott Ely
Donna Skerret
Selina Chen-Kiang
Morton Coleman
Maureen E Lane
Presbyterian Hospital · USCornell University · USNew York Hospital Queens · USNewYork–Presbyterian Hospital · US

Funding

CTSA INFRASTRUCTURE FOR PEDIATRIC RESEARCHUL1RR024996 · NCRR · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI IMPERATO-MCGINLEY, JULIANNE L · 2007 to 2011
$49.6M
Clinical and Translational Science CenterUL1TR000457 · NCATS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI IMPERATO-MCGINLEY, JULIANNE L · 2012 to 2016
$46.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000457NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024996NCRR NIH HHS UL1-RR024996
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis phase II study evaluated bortezomib-based secondary induction and stem cell mobilization in 38 transplant-eligible patients with myeloma who had an incomplete and stalled response to, or had relapsed after, previous immunomodulatory drug-based induction. EXPERIMENTAL

designPatients received up to six 21-day cycles of bortezomib plus dexamethasone, with added liposomal doxorubicin for patients not achieving partial response or better by cycle 2 or very good partial response or better (≥VGPR) by cycle 4 (DoVeD), followed by bortezomib, high-dose cyclophosphamide, and filgrastim mobilization. Gene expression/signaling pathway analyses were conducted in purified CD34+ cells after bortezomib-based mobilization and compared against patients who received only filgrastim ± cyclophosphamide. Plasma samples were similarly analyzed for quantification of associated protein markers.

resultsThe response rate to DoVeD relative to the pre-DoVeD baseline was 61%, including 39% ≥ VGPR. Deeper responses were achieved in 10 of 27 patients who received bortezomib-based mobilization; postmobilization response rate was 96%, including 48% ≥ VGPR, relative to the pre-DoVeD baseline. Median CD34+ cell yield was 23.2 × 10(6) cells/kg (median of 1 apheresis session). After a median follow-up of 46.6 months, median progression-free survival was 47.1 months from DoVeD initiation; 5-year overall survival rate was 76.4%. Grade ≥ 3 adverse events included thrombocytopenia (13%), hand-foot syndrome (11%), peripheral neuropathy (8%), and neutropenia (5%). Bortezomib-based mobilization was associated with modulated expression of genes involved in stem cell migration.

conclusionBortezomib-based secondary induction and mobilization could represent an alternative strategy for elimination of tumor burden in immunomodulatory drug-resistant patients that does not impact stem cell yield.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntigens, CD34Antineoplastic AgentsBoronic AcidsBortezomibCyclophosphamideDexamethasoneDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsDrug Resistance, NeoplasmFilgrastimGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorHumansMaleMiddle AgedAntigens, CD34Antineoplastic AgentsBoronic AcidsBortezomibCyclophosphamideDexamethasoneFilgrastimGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorPyrazinesRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID23357980
PMCPMC4020015
OpenAlexW2165988530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.