Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23357287›Full record

ArticleMathematical biosciences2013

Virus dynamics in the presence of synaptic transmission.

Natalia L Komarova, Dominik Wodarz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mathematical biosciences, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Modeling Viral Spread.Annual review of virology · 2016
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Natalia L KomarovaDepartment of Mathematics, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697, USA.
Dominik Wodarz

Funding

Viruis Dynamics and Multiple Infection of Cells: Computational and Experimental AR01AI093998 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI LEVY, DAVID N, WODARZ, DOMINIK F · 2011 to 2014
$1.5M
NIAID NIH HHS 1R01AI093998-01NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI093998
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditionally, virus dynamics models consider populations of infected and target cells, and a population of free virus that can infect susceptible cells. In recent years, however, it has become. clear that direct cell-to-cell transmission can also play an important role for the in vivo spread of viruses, especially retroviruses such as human T lymphotropic virus-1 (HTLV-1) and Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Such cell-to-cell transmission is thought to occur through the formation of virological synapses that are formed between an infected source cell and a susceptible target cell. Here we formulate and analyze a class of virus dynamics models that include such cell-cell synaptic transmission. We explore different "strategies" of the virus defined by the number of viruses passed per synapse, and determine how the choice of strategy influences the basic reproductive ratio, R0, of the virus and thus its ability to establish a persistent infection. We show that depending on specific assumptions about the viral kinetics, strategies with low or intermediate numbers of viruses transferred may correspond to the highest values of R0. We also explore the evolutionary competition of viruses of different strains, which differ by their synaptic strategy, and show that viruses characterized by synaptic strategies with the highest R0 win the evolutionary competition and exclude other, inferior, strains.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalSynaptic TransmissionVirus Physiological PhenomenaBasic Reproduction Number

Identifiers

PMID23357287
PMCPMC4122664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.