Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23357149›Full record

ArticleAtherosclerosis. Supplements2013

Effect of specific lipoprotein(a) apheresis on coronary atherosclerosis regression assessed by quantitative coronary angiography.

Maya S Safarova, Marat V Ezhov, Olga I Afanasieva, Yuriy G Matchin, Ruslan V Atanesyan, Irina Yu Adamova, Elena A Utkina, Gennadiy A Konovalov, Sergei N Pokrovsky

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyControlled Clinical TrialMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Atherosclerosis. Supplements, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02133807 (A 72-week, Prospective, Parallel-group, Partially Blinded, Controlled Phase IIIb Study Evaluating the Impact of Specific Lp), which is not on this map. Cited by 40 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
12.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02133807 phase3completednot on this map

A 72-week, Prospective, Parallel-group, Partially Blinded, Controlled Phase IIIb Study Evaluating the Impact of Specific Lp(a) Apheresis on Atherosclerotic Disease Burden in Coronary Heart Disease Patients With High Lipoprotein(a) Level.

TypeinterventionalSponsorRussian Cardiology Research and Production CenterRan2009 to 2012Enrolled32ConditionsAtherosclerosis, Coronary Disease, Carotid Artery DiseasesArmsSpecific Lp(a) apheresis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 128 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Advances in targeting LDL cholesterol: PCSK9 inhibitors and beyond.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. [State of the art: lipoprotein apheresis].Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2023
    Review
  10. Apheresis: What Should a Clinician Know?Current atherosclerosis reports · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Lipoprotein(a).Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Lipoprotein (a): Recent Updates on a Unique Lipoprotein.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2021
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Observational
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maya S SafarovaCardiology Research Center 15A, 3rd Cherepkovskaya Street, 121552 Moscow, Russia. Dr.Safarova@gmail.com
Marat V Ezhov
Olga I Afanasieva
Yuriy G Matchin
Ruslan V Atanesyan
Irina Yu Adamova
Elena A Utkina
Gennadiy A Konovalov
Sergei N Pokrovsky
Institute of Experimental Cardiology · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo evaluate the effect of specific lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] apheresis on coronary atherosclerosis progression in coronary heart disease (CHD) patients with elevated Lp(a) levels.

methodsA total of 30 subjects (mean age 53.5 ± 8.3 years, 70% male) with CHD verified by angiography, Lp(a) > 50 mg/dL, and low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) ≤ 2.5 mmol/L on chronic statin treatment were prospectively evaluated for 18 months. Patients were allocated to receive specific Lp(a) apheresis, which was carried out weekly with Lp(a) Lipopak(®) columns (POCARD Ltd., Russia) (n = 15), or atorvastatin only (n = 15). Blinded quantitative coronary angiography analyses of percent diameter stenosis and minimal lumen diameter (MLD) were performed at baseline and after the 18-month treatment period.

resultsBy the single specific Lp(a) apheresis procedure, Lp(a) level decreased by an average of 73 ± 12% to a mean of 29 ± 16 mg/dL, and mean Lp(a)-corrected LDL-C decreased by 7% to a mean of 1.4 mmol/L. Median percent diameter stenosis was reduced by -2.0 (95% confidence interval [CI], -5.0-0.0) with apheresis (p < 0.01 in comparison with baseline), and increased by 3.5 (0.0-6.9) with atorvastatin (p < 0.001 between the groups). The effect on MLD was more favorable with apheresis than with atorvastatin: 0.20 ± 0.39 mm, as compared with 0.01 ± 0.34 mm, p = 0.04. Lp(a) apheresis had greater efficacy regarding the amount of regressed/stabilized coronary segments than atorvastatin alone in the majority of patients (chi-square test 13.61, p < 0.005).

conclusionSpecific Lp(a) apheresis for 18 months produced coronary atherosclerosis regression in stable CHD patients with high Lp(a) levels and reached LDL-C goals.

Indexed as

Blood Component RemovalCoronary AngiographyAdultAtorvastatinBiomarkersChi-Square DistributionCholesterol, LDLCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary StenosisDisease ProgressionFemaleHeptanoic AcidsHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsLipoprotein(a)MaleAtorvastatinBiomarkersCholesterol, LDLHeptanoic AcidsHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsLipoprotein(a)Pyrroles

Identifiers

PMID23357149
OpenAlexW2088314613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.