Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23357106›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular and cellular cardiology2013

Abundance, distribution, mobility and oligomeric state of M₂ muscarinic acetylcholine receptors in live cardiac muscle.

Tatiana A Nenasheva, Marianne Neary, Gregory I Mashanov, Nigel J M Birdsall, Ross A Breckenridge, Justin E Molloy

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Visualization of β-adrenergic receptor dynamics and differential localization in cardiomyocytes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. GPCR homo-oligomerization.Current opinion in cell biology · 2019
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Muscarinic receptor oligomerization.Neuropharmacology · 2018
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tatiana A NenashevaDivision of Physical Biochemistry, MRC National Institute for Medical Research, Mill Hill, London NW7 1AA, UK. dreminat@mail.ru
Marianne Neary
Gregory I Mashanov
Nigel J M Birdsall
Ross A Breckenridge
Justin E Molloy
LifeArc · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation PG/10/51/28444Medical Research Council 5RN00Medical Research Council MC_U117532193Medical Research Council MC_U117570592
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

M2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors modulate cardiac rhythm via regulation of the inward potassium current. To increase our understanding of M2 receptor physiology we used Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence Microscopy to visualize individual receptors at the plasma membrane of transformed CHO(M2) cells, a cardiac cell line (HL-1), primary cardiomyocytes and tissue slices from pre- and post-natal mice. Receptor expression levels between individual cells in dissociated cardiomyocytes and heart slices were highly variable and only 10% of murine cardiomyocytes expressed muscarinic receptors. M2 receptors were evenly distributed across individual cells and their density in freshly isolated embryonic cardiomyocytes was ~1μm(-2), increasing at birth (to ~3μm(-2)) and decreasing back to ~1μm(-2) after birth. M2 receptors were primarily monomeric but formed reversible dimers. They diffused freely at the plasma membrane, moving approximately 4-times faster in heart slices than in cultured cardiomyocytes. Knowledge of receptor density and mobility has allowed receptor collision rate to be modeled by Monte Carlo simulations. Our estimated encounter rate of 5-10 collisions per second, may explain the latency between acetylcholine application and GIRK channel opening.

Indexed as

AnimalsCarbocyaninesCHO CellsCricetinaeFluorescent DyesMiceMicroscopy, FluorescenceMyocardiumMyocytes, CardiacOrgan SpecificityPrimary Cell CultureProtein Structure, QuaternaryProtein TransportReceptor, Muscarinic M2Staining and LabelingCarbocyaninescyanine dye 3Fluorescent DyesReceptor, Muscarinic M2

Identifiers

PMID23357106
PMCPMC3605596
OpenAlexW2093127088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.