ReviewBlood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue2013
How to write a scientific manuscript for publication.
Review in Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perceptions of Arab researchers regarding publishing scientific research: A cross-sectional study.Accountability in research · 2026Article
- How to be a good reviewer: A step-by-step guide for approaching peer review of a scientific manuscript.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2024Review
- Article
- How We Write a Manuscript Discussion.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2023Article
- Awareness and knowledge of manuscript writing and research integrity: A cross sectional survey among graduate students.Heliyon · 2022Article
- Essential Guide to Manuscript Writing for Academic Dummies: An Editor's Perspective.Biochemistry research international · 2022Review
- Dos and don'ts of a successfully peer-reviewed publication: From A-Z.European journal of microbiology & immunology · 2020Article
- SciPub-019-Getting Your Article Published in Scientific Journals- an Event Report.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2020Article
- The Principles of Biomedical Scientific Writing: Discussion.International journal of endocrinology and metabolism · 2019Review
- The Principles of Biomedical Scientific Writing: Materials and Methods.International journal of endocrinology and metabolism · 2019Review
- A narrative literature review of depression following traumatic brain injury: prevalence, impact, and management challenges.Psychology research and behavior management · 2017Review
- Improving the reliability of peer-reviewed publications: We are all in it together.Biomolecular detection and quantification · 2016Article
- The relationship between manuscript title structure and success: editorial decisions and citation performance for an ecological journal.Ecology and evolution · 2015Article
- Article
- Detailing the writing of scientific manuscripts: 25-30 paragraphs.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2014Article
- Preparing and Publishing a Scientific Manuscript.Journal of human reproductive sciencesReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.