Effective ways to communicate risk and benefit.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

1. Shared Decision Making in ICUs: An American College of Critical Care Medicine and American Thoracic Society Policy Statement.Critical care medicine · 2016
   Guideline
2. How do women experience a change in their clinically-derived breast cancer risk estimates: views from a UK family history risk and prevention clinic.BMC cancer · 2026
   Article
3. Predicting unplanned medical visits among patients with diabetes: translation from machine learning to clinical implementation.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2021
   Article
4. Engaging a Community Chaplaincy Resource for Interprofessional Health Care Provider Training in Facilitating Family Decision Making for Children at End-of-Life.Hawai'i journal of medicine & public health : a journal of Asia Pacific Medicine & Public Health · 2019
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as