Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23356673›Full record

Trial reportBMC pregnancy and childbirth2013

Outpatient Foley catheter versus inpatient prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour: a randomised trial.

Amanda Henry, Arushi Madan, Rachel Reid, Sally K Tracy, Kathryn Austin, Alec Welsh, Daniel Challis

8 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 8 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 29 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02210598 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2014, after this paper: background citation

Outpatient Labor Induction With the Transcervical Foley Balloon: A Randomized Trial Comparing Outpatient Immediate Removal Foley Versus Standard Inpatient Foley Induction

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Southern CaliforniaRan2014Enrolled64ConditionsPregnancy, Labor, Forced or Induced, Affecting Fetus or NewbornArmsinpatient Foley balloon induction, outpatient Foley balloon induction, Oxytocin
NCT02546193 naterminatednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Outpatient Foley Catheter Compared to Usual Inpatient Care for Cervical Ripening: a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorMayo ClinicRan2015 to 2017Enrolled39ConditionsPregnancyArmsFoley catheter, Misoprostol
NCT02756689 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Outpatient Foley for Starting Induction of Labor at Term

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamRan2016 to 2017Enrolled129ConditionsPregnancyArmsInpatient cervical ripening, Outpatient cervical ripening
NCT02793609 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Outpatient Versus Inpatient Double Balloon Catheter for Induction of Labor: a Randomised Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorTurku University HospitalRan2016 to 2019Enrolled117ConditionsProlonged PregnancyArmsIntervention is to let patient to go home., Intervention is to observe women in the ward.
NCT03199820 phase4unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Prostaglandin Insert (Propess) Versus Trans-cervical Balloon Catheter for Out-patient Labour Induction: A Randomised Controlled Trial of Feasibility

TypeinterventionalSponsorSt George's, University of LondonRan2017 to 2019Enrolled120ConditionsChildbirth Problems, Labor ComplicationArmsCook cervical balloon, Prostin E2 Vaginal Suppository
NCT03380897 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Sleep Disturbances and Depression of the Mother Affect to the Pain During Balloon Catheter Induction of Labour

TypeinterventionalSponsorTurku University HospitalRan2017 to 2019Enrolled117ConditionsProlonged Pregnancy, Sleep Disturbance, DepressionArmsIntervention for outpatient group was to go home, Intervention for inpatient group was to stay at ward
NCT03472937 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Outpatient Foley For Starting Induction of Labor at Term in Nulliparous Women: A Randomized-Controlled Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamRan2018 to 2019Enrolled126ConditionsPregnancy RelatedArmsTranscervical Foley catheter placement for cervical ripening
NCT03665688 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Induction of Labor in Women With Unfavorable Cervix: Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Outpatient to Inpatient Cervical Ripening Using Dilapan-S® (HOMECARE)

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe University of Texas Medical Branch, GalvestonRan2018 to 2021Enrolled338ConditionsLabor, Induced, Cervix Uteri-DiseasesArmsOutpatient Dilapan-S, Inpatient Dilapan-S
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 104 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Home versus inpatient induction of labour for improving birth outcomes.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Methods of induction of labour: a network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Mechanical methods for induction of labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Amanda HenrySchool of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Kensington, Australia. Amanda.Henry@unsw.edu.au
Arushi Madan
Rachel Reid
Sally K Tracy
Kathryn Austin
Alec Welsh
Daniel Challis
UNSW Sydney · AURoyal Hospital for Women · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInduction of labour (IOL) is one of the commonest obstetric interventions, with significant impact on both the individual woman and health service delivery. Outpatient IOL is an attractive option to reduce these impacts. To date there is little data comparing outpatient and inpatient IOL methods, and potential safety concerns (hyperstimulation) if prostaglandins, the standard inpatient IOL medications, are used in the outpatient setting. The purpose of this study was to assess feasibility, clinical effectiveness and patient acceptability of outpatient Foley catheter (OPC) vs. inpatient vaginal PGE2 (IP) for induction of labour (IOL) at term.

methodsWomen with an unfavourable cervix requiring IOL at term (N=101) were randomised to outpatient care using Foley catheter (OPC, n=50) or inpatient care using vaginal PGE2 (IP, n=51). OPC group had Foley catheter inserted and were discharged overnight following a reassuring cardiotocograph. IP group received 2 mg/1 mg vaginal PGE2 if nulliparous or 1 mg/1 mg if multiparous. Main outcome measures were inpatient stay (prior to birth, in Birthing Unit, total), mode of birth, induction to delivery interval, adverse reactions and patient satisfaction.

resultsOPC group had shorter hospital stay prior to birth (21.3 vs. 32.4 hrs, p< .001), IP were more likely to achieve vaginal birth within 12 hours of presenting to Birthing Unit (53% vs. 28%, p= .01). Vaginal birth rates (66% OPC Vs. 71% IP), total induction to delivery time (33.5 hrs vs. 31.3 hrs) and total inpatient times (96 hrs OPC Vs. 105 hrs IP) were similar. OPC group felt less pain (significant discomfort 26% Vs 58%, p=.003), and had more sleep (5.8 Vs 3.4 hours, p< .001), during cervical preparation, but were more likely to require oxytocin IOL (88 Vs 59%, p=.001).

conclusionsOPC was feasible and acceptable for IOL of women with an unfavourable cervix at term compared to IP, however did not show a statistically significant reduction in total inpatient stay and was associated with increased oxytocin IOL.

trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN:12609000420246.

Indexed as

AdultAmbulatory CareAustraliaCervical RipeningCervix UteriComparative Effectiveness ResearchDinoprostoneFeasibility StudiesFemaleHospitalizationHumansLabor, InducedOxytocicsPatient Acceptance of Health CarePatient SatisfactionPregnancyDinoprostoneOxytocics

Identifiers

PMID23356673
PMCPMC3564932
OpenAlexW2003645523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

and 2 more above

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.