Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23356304›Full record

ReviewBiochemical Society transactions2013

End-resection at DNA double-strand breaks in the three domains of life.

John K Blackwood, Neil J Rzechorzek, Sian M Bray, Joseph D Maman, Luca Pellegrini, Nicholas P Robinson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biochemical Society transactions, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Open biology · 2020
    Review
  8. Modes of action of the archaeal Mre11/Rad50 DNA-repair complex revealed by fast-scan atomic force microscopy.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  9. Emerging Therapeutic Targets AgainstFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Subversion of host genome integrity by bacterial pathogens.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2016
    Review
  17. Article
  18. The archaeal Ced system imports DNA.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

John K BlackwoodDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1GA, UK.
Neil J Rzechorzek
Sian M Bray
Joseph D Maman
Luca Pellegrini
Nicholas P Robinson

Funding

Medical Research Council G0701443Wellcome Trust 08279/2/07/ZWellcome Trust 084279
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During DNA repair by HR (homologous recombination), the ends of a DNA DSB (double-strand break) must be resected to generate single-stranded tails, which are required for strand invasion and exchange with homologous chromosomes. This 5'-3' end-resection of the DNA duplex is an essential process, conserved across all three domains of life: the bacteria, eukaryota and archaea. In the present review, we examine the numerous and redundant helicase and nuclease systems that function as the enzymatic analogues for this crucial process in the three major phylogenetic divisions.

Indexed as

DNA DamageDNADNA, ArchaealDNA, BacterialEukaryotic CellsPhylogenyDNADNA, ArchaealDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID23356304
PMCPMC3561678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.