Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23355822›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2012

Development of a physiologically based computational kidney model to describe the renal excretion of hydrophilic agents in rats.

Christoph Niederalt, Thomas Wendl, Lars Kuepfer, Karina Claassen, Roland Loosen, Stefan Willmann, Joerg Lippert, Marcus Schultze-Mosgau, Julia Winkler, Rolf Burghaus and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Applied Concepts in PBPK Modeling: How to Build a PBPK/PD Model.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2016
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Christoph NiederaltComputational Systems Biology, Bayer Technology Services GmbH Leverkusen, Germany.
Thomas Wendl
Lars Kuepfer
Karina Claassen
Roland Loosen
Stefan Willmann
Joerg Lippert
Marcus Schultze-Mosgau
Julia Winkler
Rolf Burghaus
Matthias Bräutigam
Hubertus Pietsch
Philipp Lengsfeld
Bayer (Germany) · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEConstructor University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A physiologically based kidney model was developed to analyze the renal excretion and kidney exposure of hydrophilic agents, in particular contrast media, in rats. In order to study the influence of osmolality and viscosity changes, the model mechanistically represents urine concentration by water reabsorption in different segments of kidney tubules and viscosity dependent tubular fluid flow. The model was established using experimental data on the physiological steady state without administration of any contrast media or drugs. These data included the sodium and urea concentration gradient along the cortico-medullary axis, water reabsorption, urine flow, and sodium as well as urea urine concentrations for a normal hydration state. The model was evaluated by predicting the effects of mannitol and contrast media administration and comparing to experimental data on cortico-medullary concentration gradients, urine flow, urine viscosity, hydrostatic tubular pressures and single nephron glomerular filtration rate. Finally the model was used to analyze and compare typical examples of ionic and non-ionic monomeric as well as non-ionic dimeric contrast media with respect to their osmolality and viscosity. With the computational kidney model, urine flow depended mainly on osmolality, while osmolality and viscosity were important determinants for tubular hydrostatic pressure and kidney exposure. The low diuretic effect of dimeric contrast media in combination with their high intrinsic viscosity resulted in a high viscosity within the tubular fluid. In comparison to monomeric contrast media, this led to a higher increase in tubular pressure, to a reduction in glomerular filtration rate and tubular flow and to an increase in kidney exposure. The presented kidney model can be implemented into whole body physiologically based pharmacokinetic models and extended in order to simulate the renal excretion of lipophilic drugs which may also undergo active secretion and reabsorption.

Indexed as

contrast mediakidneymodelingosmotic diuresisphysiologically based pharmacokinetic modelingsimulationviscosity

Identifiers

PMID23355822
PMCPMC3553339
OpenAlexW2136675733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.