Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23355668›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2013

Optimising drug prescribing and dispensing in subjects at risk for drug errors due to renal impairment: improving drug safety in primary healthcare by low eGFR alerts.

Hanneke Joosten, Iefke Drion, Kees J Boogerd, Emiel V van der Pijl, Robbert J Slingerland, Joris P J Slaets, Tiele J Jansen, Olof Schwantje, Reinold O B Gans, Henk J G Bilo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Improvement of drug prescribing in acute kidney injury with a nephrotoxic drug alert system.European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Use of renal risk drugs in patients with renal impairment.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Hanneke JoostenUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Department of Internal Medicine, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Iefke Drion
Kees J Boogerd
Emiel V van der Pijl
Robbert J Slingerland
Joris P J Slaets
Tiele J Jansen
Olof Schwantje
Reinold O B Gans
Henk J G Bilo
Isala · NLUniversity of Groningen · NLAmerican Society of Safety Professionals · USDiabetes Australia · AUUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess the risk of medication errors in subjects with renal impairment (defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≤40 ml/min/1.73 m(2)) and the effectiveness of automatic eGFR ≤40-alerts relayed to community pharmacists.

designClinical survey.

settingThe city of Zwolle, The Netherlands, in a primary care setting including 22 community pharmacists and 65 general practitioners.

participantsAll adults who underwent ambulatory creatine measurements which triggered an eGFR ≤40-alert. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The total number of ambulatory subjects with an eGFR ≤40-alert during the study period of 1 year and the number of medication errors related to renal impairment. The type and number of proposed drug adjustments recommended by the community pharmacist and acceptance rate by the prescribing physicians. Classification of all medication errors on their potential to cause an adverse drug event (ADE) and the actual occurrence of ADEs (limited to those identified through hospital record reviews) 1 year after the introduction of the alerts.

resultsCreatine measurements were performed in 25 929 adults. An eGFR ≤40-alert was indicated for 5.3% (n=1369). This group had a median (IQR) age of 78 (69, 84) years, and in 73% polypharmacy (≥5 drugs) was present. In 15% (n=211) of these subjects, a medication error was detected. The proportion of errors increased with age. Pharmacists recommended 342 medication adjustments, mainly concerning diuretics (22%) and antibiotics (21%). The physicians' acceptance rate was 66%. Of all the medication errors, 88% were regarded as potential ADEs, with most classified as significant or serious. At follow-up, the ADE risk (n=40) appeared highest when the proposed medication adjustments were not implemented (38% vs 6%).

conclusionsThe introduction of automatic eGFR-alerts identified a considerable number of subjects who are at risk for ADEs due to renal impairment in an ambulatory setting. The nationwide implementation of this simple protocol could identify many potential ADEs, thereby substantially reducing iatrogenic complications in subjects with impaired renal function.

Identifiers

PMID23355668
PMCPMC3563134
OpenAlexW2043588464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.