Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23355638›Full record

ArticleDrug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals2013

A physiologically based pharmacokinetic model to predict disposition of CYP2D6 and CYP1A2 metabolized drugs in pregnant women.

Alice Ban Ke, Srikanth C Nallani, Ping Zhao, Amin Rostami-Hodjegan, Nina Isoherranen, Jashvant D Unadkat

Open access · bronzeAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Optimal Dosing Recommendations of Clonidine in Pediatrics Using Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Alice Ban KeDepartment of Pharmaceutics, University of Washington, Box 357610, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Srikanth C Nallani
Ping Zhao
Amin Rostami-Hodjegan
Nina Isoherranen
Jashvant D Unadkat
Simcyp (United Kingdom) · GBUniversity of Manchester · GBCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research · US

Funding

UW Obstetric-Fetal Pharmacology Research UnitU10HD047892 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI EASTERLING, THOMAS R, HEBERT, MARY F · 2004 to 2014
$9.4M
NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD047892NICHD NIH HHS U10HD047892
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conducting pharmacokinetic (PK) studies in pregnant women is challenging. Therefore, we asked if a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model could be used to evaluate different dosing regimens for pregnant women. We refined and verified our previously published pregnancy PBPK model by incorporating cytochrome P450 CYP1A2 suppression (based on caffeine PK) and CYP2D6 induction (based on metoprolol PK) into the model. This model accounts for gestational age-dependent changes in maternal physiology and hepatic CYP3A activity. For verification, the disposition of CYP1A2-metabolized drug theophylline (THEO) and CYP2D6-metabolized drugs paroxetine (PAR), dextromethorphan (DEX), and clonidine (CLO) during pregnancy was predicted. Our PBPK model successfully predicted THEO disposition during the third trimester (T3). Predicted mean postpartum to third trimester (PP:T3) ratios of THEO area under the curve (AUC), maximum plasma concentration, and minimum plasma concentration were 0.76, 0.95, and 0.66 versus observed values 0.75, 0.89, and 0.72, respectively. The predicted mean PAR steady-state plasma concentration (Css) ratio (PP:T3) was 7.1 versus the observed value 3.7. Predicted mean DEX urinary ratio (UR) (PP:T3) was 2.9 versus the observed value 1.9. Predicted mean CLO AUC ratio (PP:T3) was 2.2 versus the observed value 1.7. Sensitivity analysis suggested that a 100% induction of CYP2D6 during T3 was required to recover the observed PP:T3 ratios of PAR Css, DEX UR, and CLO AUC. Based on these data, it is prudent to conclude that the magnitude of hepatic CYP2D6 induction during T3 ranges from 100 to 200%. Our PBPK model can predict the disposition of CYP1A2, 2D6, and 3A drugs during pregnancy.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalClonidineCytochrome P-450 CYP1A2Cytochrome P-450 CYP2D6Cytochrome P-450 CYP3ADextromethorphanFemaleHumansParoxetinePregnancyTheophyllineClonidineCYP3A protein, humanCytochrome P-450 CYP1A2Cytochrome P-450 CYP2D6Cytochrome P-450 CYP3ADextromethorphanParoxetineTheophylline

Identifiers

PMID23355638
PMCPMC3608458
OpenAlexW2129701778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.