Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23355484›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA

Comparison and validation of genomic predictors for anticancer drug sensitivity.

Simon Papillon-Cavanagh, Nicolas De Jay, Nehme Hachem, Catharina Olsen, Gianluca Bontempi, Hugo J W L Aerts, John Quackenbush, Benjamin Haibe-Kains

Abstract readComparative StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Machine learning in the prediction of cancer therapy.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Frontiers in pharmacology · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Simon Papillon-CavanaghBioinformatics and Computational Genomics Laboratory, Institut de recherches cliniques de Montréal, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Nicolas De Jay
Nehme Hachem
Catharina Olsen
Gianluca Bontempi
Hugo J W L Aerts
John Quackenbush
Benjamin Haibe-Kains

Funding

Epidemiologic StudiesU19CA148065 · NCI · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI AHSAN, HABIBUL, BRUGGE, JOAN SIEFERT · 2010 to 2014
$10.6M
Integrated approaches to deriving predictive networks from public data sourcesR01LM010129 · NLM · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI QUACKENBUSH, JOHN · 2009 to 2010
$1.4M
NLM NIH HHS R01 LM010129NLM NIH HHS R01 LM010129-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn enduring challenge in personalized medicine lies in selecting the right drug for each individual patient. While testing of drugs on patients in large trials is the only way to assess their clinical efficacy and toxicity, we dramatically lack resources to test the hundreds of drugs currently under development. Therefore the use of preclinical model systems has been intensively investigated as this approach enables response to hundreds of drugs to be tested in multiple cell lines in parallel.

methodsTwo large-scale pharmacogenomic studies recently screened multiple anticancer drugs on over 1000 cell lines. We propose to combine these datasets to build and robustly validate genomic predictors of drug response. We compared five different approaches for building predictors of increasing complexity. We assessed their performance in cross-validation and in two large validation sets, one containing the same cell lines present in the training set and another dataset composed of cell lines that have never been used during the training phase.

resultsSixteen drugs were found in common between the datasets. We were able to validate multivariate predictors for three out of the 16 tested drugs, namely irinotecan, PD-0325901, and PLX4720. Moreover, we observed that response to 17-AAG, an inhibitor of Hsp90, could be efficiently predicted by the expression level of a single gene, NQO1.

conclusionThese results suggest that genomic predictors could be robustly validated for specific drugs. If successfully validated in patients' tumor cells, and subsequently in clinical trials, they could act as companion tests for the corresponding drugs and play an important role in personalized medicine.

Indexed as

Models, GeneticPharmacogeneticsPrecision MedicineAntineoplastic AgentsCell Line, TumorComputational BiologyDatabases, GeneticHumansNeoplasmsTranscriptomeAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkersCancer GenomicsDrug DiscoveryMachine LearningPeronalized MedicinePharmacogenomics

Identifiers

PMID23355484
PMCPMC3721163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.