ArticleTropical animal health and production2013
Herd and individual animal prevalence of bovine brucellosis with associated risk factors on dairy farms in Haryana and Punjab in India.
Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Brucellosis seroprevalence in cattle in China during 2014-2024: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Emerging microbes & infections · 2024Pooled it
- Bovine brucellosis sero-prevalence trend during 2011-14 and 2015-18 in Indian sub-continent.Veterinary research communications · 2025Article
- Seroprevalence of Brucellosis in Haryana, India: A Study Using Rose Bengal Plate Test and Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Risk perception, seroprevalence, and real-time PCR detection of Brucella among pyretic patients and domestic animals in Kwara State, Nigeria.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The Reasons Behind Long-Term Endemicity of Brucellosis in Low and Middle-Income Countries: Challenges and Future Perspectives.Current microbiology · 2024Review
- Seroprevalence and Risk Factors Related to Bovine Brucellosis in Continental Ecuador.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Management of bovine brucellosis in organized dairy herds through the identification of risk factors: A cross-sectional study from Karnataka, India.Veterinary world · 2023Article
- Farm Prevalence of Bovine Brucellosis, Farmer Awareness, and Local Practices in Small- and Medium-Scale Cattle Farms in a Tropical Region of Ecuador.Transboundary and emerging diseases · 2023Article
- Prevalence of brucellosis in livestock keepers and domestic ruminants in Baringo County, Kenya.PLOS global public health · 2022Article
- Epidemiology of bovine brucellosis in Hisar, India: identification of risk factors and assessment of knowledge, attitudes, and practices among livestock owners.Tropical animal health and production · 2021Article
- Epidemiology of brucellosis in cattle and dairy farmers of rural Ludhiana, Punjab.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2021Article
- Seroprevalence and risk factors for bovine brucellosis in the Chittagong Metropolitan Area of Bangladesh.Veterinary medicine and science · 2021Article
- Multilocus variable number tandem repeat analysis (MLVA)-typing of Brucella abortus isolates of India reveals limited genetic diversity.Tropical animal health and production · 2020Article
- Brucellosis in India: results of a collaborative workshop to define One Health priorities.Tropical animal health and production · 2020Article
- Seroprevalence of brucellosis and risk factors associated with its seropositivity in cattle, goats and humans in Iganga District, Uganda.The Pan African medical journal · 2019Article
- Sero-prevalence and associated risk factors of Brucellosis among Malaria negative febrile out-patients in Wakiso district, Central Uganda.BMC research notes · 2018Article
- Abortions in an organized dairy farm from North India reveal the possibility of breed susceptibility to Bovine Brucellosis.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2018Article
- Brucellosis remains a neglected disease in the developing world: a call for interdisciplinary action.BMC public health · 2018Article
- Bovine and Caprine Brucellosis in Bangladesh: Bayesian evaluation of four serological tests, true prevalence, and associated risk factors in household animals.Tropical animal health and production · 2017Article
- Vaccination of adult animals with a reduced dose of Brucella abortus S19 vaccine to control brucellosis on dairy farms in endemic areas of India.Tropical animal health and production · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Herd and individual animal prevalence along with associated risk factors of bovine brucellosis was assessed on dairy farms located in 22 districts in Haryana and Punjab of India. Examination of 4,580 female animals of 119 dairy farms by Rose Bengal test and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay revealed that an overall herd prevalence was 65.54% (78/119) and individual animal prevalence was 26.50 % (1,214/4,580). Herd prevalence in Haryana was 62.79% which was not significantly different (P = 0.4208) from Punjab (72.72%). Individual animal prevalence was 34.15% in Punjab which was significantly higher (P < 0.0001) than Haryana (22.34%). Prevalence of brucellosis on dairy farms was detected in 20 of the 22 districts, of which 12 districts were in Haryana and 8 in Punjab. Risk factors such as species of animals, age of animals, herd size, awareness of dairymen for brucellosis, entry of a purchased animals on the farm, abortion on farm, use of calving pens, type of breeding, and type of farming were analyzed. The study indicated that the odds ratio (OR) was significant with risk factors of species (OR = 1.63; 95 %CI = 1.40-1.90; P < 0.0001), age (OR = 0.22; 95%CI = 0.17-0.29; P < 0.0001), awareness of brucellosis among dairymen (OR = 21.65; 95%CI = 2.63-178.04; P = 0.0042), entry of purchased animal on the farm (OR = 9.16; 95%CI = 2.38-35.18; P = 0.0012), abortion in animals (OR = 5.57; 95%CI = 1.92-16.10; P = 0.0015) and on cow farm (OR = 3.43; 95 %CI = 1.33-8.82; P = 0.0105). While the OR was insignificant (P > 0.05) with risk factors of herd size, use of calving pen on farms, type of breeding and on buffalo and mixed type of farms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23354992What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.